Control, consent and complicity in the coaching of elite women’s cycling in Australia: a media analysis

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to extend understanding of how athletes and coaches in a women’s cycling talent development and selection programme negotiate and normalise athlete abuse in the media. A thematic analysis of six online cycling magazine articles and their representations of the Australian women’s elite cycling development camp was analysed to explore athletic abuse and the (re)production of coaching practices using Bourdieusian theory. The findings revealed a link between the expression of coaching practice and the maltreatment of athletes. Analysis of these articles also revealed that athletes were complicit in the normalisation of coaching practices through the misrecognition of social power embedded in the coaching intervention. The representations by athletes within the articles contributed narratives related to the reproduction and proliferation of abusive coaching practices. This study extends understanding of how taken for granted and power laden aspects of coaching practices can be presented in the media and highlights the implications for coaches, athletes and the general public that consume online cycling media content.

KEYWORDS:

• Media analysis
• emotional abuse
• misrecognition
• symbolic violence
• women’s cycling

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Chris Zehntner http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-3246

Kerry R. McGannon http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-697X

Jenny McMahon http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-8939

Notes

1. This heading is the title used by Rook (2015, para. 1) in her expose of the AIS selection camp.