![Sample our Urban Studies journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110826/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Urban-Studies.jpg"})
Abstract
This paper explores planning and design processes through a verbal and visual rhetoric approach by examining three case studies of train station area redevelopments in the Netherlands. The paper illustrates how these case study projects were conceived, constructed, transformed and communicated to the stakeholders through stories and pictures. Three threads are discerned, which run through the verbal and visual narratives employed in the case study projects. The first is a longing for identity and a return to the past. The second is a desire to project an image of progress and success. The third is a shift from grand to piecemeal planning. The three threads are overlapping but also contradictory. While some of the rhetoric appears to be post-rationalization, its employment had a strong ethical basis because, by densifying and revitalizing the areas in the vicinity of main train stations, the three projects sought to advance the public interest. While visually diverse and controversial, all three case study areas represented a response to contemporary problems, such as urban economic decline or automobile dependence.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank all the individuals who generously agreed to be interviewed during the research for this paper.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. Many Dutch cities, even medium-sized cities such as Arnhem, Delft and Zaandam, have more than one railway station in the city. There are four railway stations in Arnhem, while Delft and Arnhem both have two stations.
2. Because fewer nostalgic invocations can be found in the case of Arnhem, its station redevelopment project does not feature strongly in the discussion in this section.