Abstract
This article takes Dixon and Scheurell's framework for understanding colonisation processes within social welfare policies and applies it to child welfare for Indigenous populations in the United States and Norway. While those countries’ historical child welfare policies follow Dixon and Scheurell's hypotheses regarding colonisation, each nation took very different legal approaches to ensure culturally appropriate child welfare services to their Indigenous populations. Ultimately, however, both countries’ current legal policies leave much responsibility for implementing culturally responsive practice squarely on the shoulders of practitioners. Thus, the policy and practice recommendations for both countries necessitate similar actions.
Notes
1. Throughout this paper the terms American Indians, Native Americans and Indigenous populations will be used interchangeably.
2. Semi-sovereign status means that the tribe's sovereignty is limited by its legal relationship with the US government. See Wilkins and Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark (Citation2011).
3. Norway does not collect data on its population by race or ethnic group. Sámi population estimates range from 30,000 to 100,000 (for a discussion see Østby, 2001).
4. The ICWA does not apply to American Indian children who are not enrolled or eligible for enrolment in a federally recognised tribe.
5. Here, “American Indian children” only includes those that are members of federally recognised tribes or those that are eligible for enrolment in a federally recognised tribe.
6. “Native American” refers to US Indigenous populations who are not federally recognised.