Publication Cover
Laterality
Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition
Volume 22, 2017 - Issue 5
218
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of induced placental and fetal growth restriction, size at birth and early neonatal growth on behavioural and brain structural lateralization in sheep

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 560-589 | Received 28 Jun 2016, Accepted 28 Sep 2016, Published online: 19 Oct 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Poor perinatal growth in humans results in asymmetrical grey matter loss in fetuses and infants and increased functional and behavioural asymmetry, but specific contributions of pre- and postnatal growth are unclear. We therefore compared strength and direction of lateralization in obstacle avoidance and maze exit preference tasks in offspring of placentally restricted (PR: 10M, 13F) and control (CON: 23M, 17F) sheep pregnancies at 18 and 40 weeks of age, and examined gross brain structure of the prefrontal cortex at 52 weeks of age (PR: 14M, 18F; CON: 23M, 25F). PR did not affect lateralization direction, but 40-week-old PR females had greater lateralization strength than CON (P = .021). Behavioural lateralization measures were not correlated with perinatal growth. PR did not alter brain morphology. In males, cross-sectional areas of the prefrontal cortex and left hemisphere correlated positively with skull width at birth, and white matter area correlated positively with neonatal growth rate of the skull (all P < .05). These studies reinforce the need to include progeny of both sexes in future studies of neurodevelopmental programming, and suggest that restricting in utero growth has relatively mild effects on gross brain structural or behavioural lateralization in sheep.

Acknowledgements

We thank Laboratory Animal Services of the University of Adelaide for their excellent animal care throughout this project. We also thank Gary Heinemann, Anita Peura, Cathy Dodd, Natasha Campbell, Alexandra Jordan, Kaitlyn Crabb, Helen Rimington and all others who assisted with sheep handling during these experiments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by project funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, under grants [627123] and [1011767] (http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/). DSH was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and HL was supported by a University of Adelaide Faculty of Health Sciences Postgraduate Scholarship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.