Publication Cover
Laterality
Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition
Volume 24, 2019 - Issue 5
150
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is self-report a valid measure of unimanual object-based task performance?

, , &
Pages 538-558 | Received 18 Jun 2018, Accepted 14 Nov 2018, Published online: 23 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Hand preference is commonly measured via self-report using instruments known as handedness inventories. These instruments query which hand subjects use to perform unimanual object-based tasks and also the consistency of usage. Scores reveal which hand people report using most (i.e., which hand is preferred). Some people report highly consistent usage of their preferred hand while others report relatively inconsistent usage. These reports are often assumed to be accurate descriptions of people’s actual behavior, but empirical evidence concerning their validity is surprisingly scant. In the present research, subjects completed a handedness inventory on which higher scores indicated more consistent usage of the preferred hand. After a brief filled interval, subjects performed tasks listed on the inventory, spontaneously choosing which hand to use for each task. Subjects who scored higher on the inventory used the preferred hand more often. Subjects were then timed while performing the tasks as fast as they could with each hand. Subjects were faster when using their preferred hand and the magnitude of the preferred hand advantage was positively correlated with self-reported consistency. These results support the validity of inventory scores by showing that they are related to spontaneous hand choice and manual fluency when performing inventory tasks.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 These tasks comprised tests of episodic memory and questionnaires regarding anxiety and authoritarianism.

2 Dean (Citation1978) did not specify the nature of the correlation he computed.

3 Preferred-hand use among consistent-handers was near ceiling and was much less variable than among inconsistent-handers. We therefore report the result of an unequal variance Welch t test.

4 Following Szumilas (Citation2010), the odds ratio was calculated as (number of inconsistent-handers who used their nonpreferred hand at least once X number of consistent-handers who never used their nonpreferred hand) ÷ (number of inconsistent-handers who never used their nonpreferred hand X number of consistent-handers who used their nonpreferred hand at least once).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.