248
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A concept for mitigating head injury under translational blunt impact

, &
Pages 483-494 | Received 22 Oct 2014, Accepted 03 Apr 2015, Published online: 28 May 2015
 

Abstract

This study assesses a bi-layer composite concept for mitigating the severity of injury due to translational blunt impact of an unprotected head at moderately high speeds. The concept comprises crushable foam and a stiff face-sheet on the impacting face. Approximate analytical models for acceleration–time histories of prototypical impact scenarios are used to guide the design. The key design variables probed experimentally are the crushing strength of the underlying foam and the tile size. The efficacy of the composite systems and the foams alone is ascertained through a series of drop impact tests with an instrumented head-form at a representative impact velocity (6.7 m/s, 15 mph), using three commercial viscoelastic foams, with and without face-sheets. The measurements are analysed in terms of five performance metrics: the peak acceleration, the Gadd severity index (GSI), the head injury criterion (HIC), the skull fracture correlate (SFC) and the head impact power (HIP). The experiments demonstrate that, with the addition of a face-sheet, each of these metrics can be reduced substantially (by as much as a factor of two) relative to those of the foam alone. The benefits derive from spreading of contact forces over a larger area of foam by the face-sheet.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies through grant W911NF-09-0001 from the US Army Research Office. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Note

Notes

1. Although this study was not designed to address specific applications, the foam thickness (38 mm) selected for the experimental portion is broadly consistent with the expected allowable thickness of impact protection systems for cabin interiors of automobiles (∼25–50 mm). Similarly, the impact velocity was selected to be consistent with the test standards employed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies [grant W911NF-09-0001] from the US Army Research Office.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 433.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.