Abstract
France is usually considered as the symbol of cultural unification and homogeneity. It is commonly (and, in part, correctly) assumed that the process of political centralization in France profoundly shaped the language preferences of citizens. Nevertheless, sociological surveys reveal a tension between the Jacobin Republican drive for uniformity and a more fine-grained empirical reality in the field of the governance of regional languages. Through the comparison of three case studies (Corsica, Brittany and Picardy), this paper reveals that the defence of lesser-used languages and regional dialects has produced an asymmetrical form of ethnolinguistic mobilization by social movements and political parties, which has been more or less credible depending on processes of institutionalization, actor-accommodation and the official recognition of the lesser-used language in question. Through focusing on the specific case of regional languages, the article leads us to examine not only the recent transformations of the French language policy model, but also to reconsider the nature of the contemporary French state.
Keywords:
Notes
This investigation is based on a series of structured interviews, a mass survey in Brittany in 2001 and on an inquiry of secondary literature and grey literature carried out between 2001 and 2006. This comparative investigation received the financial backing of the post-doctoral programme of the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and, for the Breton case, of the UK Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L215292007). This article was finalized as part of the Leverhulme Trust's International Network on ‘Territorial Governance in Western Europe: between capacity and convergence’ (IN-2012-109).