Narcissistic Rage and Neoliberal Reproduction

Abstract

Combining political economy and depth psychology, this article seeks to elucidate the socio-psychical underpinnings of neoliberalism’s resilience following the global financial crisis. In explicating neoliberalism’s reproduction, the analysis employs self psychologist Heinz Kohut’s theorisation of narcissistic development. Kohut conceives narcissism as a normal condition driving self-formation, but claims that obstructions in its development result in impaired self-esteem and self-confidence, a lack of empathy and aggression against others and the self. The article argues that neoliberalism fosters and is reinforced by narcissistic configurations that impede the attainment of a more stable sense of self. The inability to attain narcissistic fulfilment through neoliberal sociality contributes to defensive and compensatory reactions that entrench neoliberalism’s logic and, through economic performativity, manifest in what Kohut termed narcissistic rage. As an exemplar of this phenomenon, the article examines the emergence of popular neoliberalism in the form of the Tea Party.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the anonymous reviewers, who have provided thoughtful and productive feedback in developing this article. I also wish to express my gratitude to several colleagues who have offered invaluable input.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

About the Author

Earl Gammon is a Lecturer in Global Political Economy in the Department of International Relations at the University of Sussex. His research examines the socio-psychical dimensions of political-economic agency. His current project, drawing on developments in affective neuroscience and neuropsychology, seeks to advance the theorisation of emotions in international relations.

Notes

1. Robert Wade, “Financial Regime Change?”, New Left Review, Vol. 53 (2008), p. 188; Barry Gills, “The Swinging of the Pendulum: The Global Crisis and Beyond”, Globalizations, Vol. 5, No. 4 (2008), pp. 513–522.

2. David Harvey, “The Crisis and the Consolidation of Class Power: Is This Really the End of Neoliberalism?”, CounterPunch, available: <http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/03/13/is-this-really-the-end-of-neoliberalism/> (accessed 21 May 2015).

3. Colin Crouch, The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011).

4. Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown (London: Verso, 2013).

5. Ibid., pp. 356–357.

6. Michel Callon, “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics”, in Michel Callon (ed.), The Laws of the Markets (Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review, 1998), pp. 1–57.

7. Donald MacKenzie, An Engine Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).

8. James Brassett and Chris Clarke, “Performing the Sub-Prime Crisis: Trauma and the Financial Event”, International Political Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2012), pp. 4–20.

9. Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), p. 226.

10. Nikolas Rose, “Governing the Enterprising Self”, in Paul Heelas and Paul Morris (eds.), The Values of Enterprise Culture: The Moral Debate (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 141–164; Nikolas Rose, Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge, 1990).

11. Paul Langley, The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

12. Christopher Payne, The Consumer, Credit and Neoliberalism: Governing the Modern Economy (London: Routledge, 2012).

13. Brassett and Clarke, op. cit.

14. Langley explores governance apparatuses employed to create an “affective atmosphere of confidence”. See Paul Langley, Liquidity Lost: The Governance of the Global Financial Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). Kiersey investigates “affective subjectification”, the managing and shaping of subjects’ emotional valorisations, in the post-crisis era. He looks at how reality TV in Ireland contributed to subjects’ reinvestment in an emotionally and financially oppressive regime of valorisation. See Nicholas Kiersey, “‘Retail Therapy in the Dragon’s Den’: Neoliberalism and Affective Labour in the Popular Culture of Ireland’s Financial Crisis”, Global Society, Vol. 28, No. 3 (2014), pp. 356–374.

15. For earlier work exploring the psychodynamics of political economy, what has been referred to as “libidinal political economy”, see Earl Gammon and Ronen Palan, “Libidinal International Political Economy”, in Marieke De Goede (ed.), International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 97–114; Angus Cameron, Anastasia Nesvetailova and Ronen Palan, “Wages of Sin?”, Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2011), pp. 117–135

16. Samuel Knafo, Sahil Dutta, Matthieu Hughes, Richard Lane and Steffan Wyn-Jones, “Re-assembling Neoliberalism: On the Managerial Roots of Neoliberal Governance”, Unpublished Manuscript (Brighton: University of Sussex, 2015).

17. Christopher Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations (New York: W.W. Norton, 1978).

18. Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011); Lauren Berlant, “Cruel Optimism”, differences, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2006), pp. 20–36.

19. Berlant, Cruel Optimism, op. cit., p. 25.

20. Martijn Konings, The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressives Have Missed (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015).

21. For example, see Lasch, op. cit.

22. Sigmund Freud, “Civilization and Its Discontents”, in James Strachey, Anna Freud, Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 21 (London: Hogarth, 1961), p. 72.

23. Sigmund Freud, “Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Part III”, in James Strachey, Anna Freud, Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 16 (London: Hogarth, 1963), pp. 243–476; Sigmund Freud, “Instincts and Their Vicissitudes”, in James Strachey, Anna Freud, Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14 (London: Hogarth, 1957), pp. 109–140.

24. Andre Green, The Fabric of Affect in the Psychoanalytic Discourse (London: Routledge, 1999).

25. Sigmund Freud, “Totem and Taboo”, in James Strachey, Anna Freud, Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson (eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 13 (London: Hogarth, 1955), p. 89.

26. Heinz Kohut, The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders (London: Hogarth Press, 1971), p. 299.

27. Heinz Kohut and Philip Seitz, “Concepts and Theories of Psychoanalysis”, in Paul Ornstein (ed.), The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut: 1950–1978, Vol. 1 (London: Karnac, 2011), p. 307.

28. Heinz Kohut and Ernest Wolf, “The Disorders of the Self and Their Treatment: An Outline”, in Paul Ornstein (ed.), The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut: 1978–1981, Vol. 3 (London: Karnac, 2011), p. 361.

29. Mario Jacoby, Individuation and Narcissism: The Psychology of Self in Jung and Kohut (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 183.

30. Based on Kohut, Analysis of the Self, op. cit., p. 9; Allen Siegel, Heinz Kohut and the Psychology of the Self (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 68.

31. Kohut, Analysis of the Self, op. cit., pp. 298–299.

32. Ibid., p. 181.

33. Heinz Kohut, “Thoughts on Narcissism and Narcissistic Rage”, in Paul Ornstein (ed.), The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut: 1950–1978, Vol. 2 (London: Karnac, 2011), pp. 637–638.

34. Ibid., p. 644.

35. Heinz Kohut, “Introspection, Empathy, and Psychoanalysis: An Examination of the Relationship between Mode of Observation and Theory”, in Ornstein, The Search for the Self, Vol. 1, op. cit., pp. 205–235; Heinz Kohut, “Reflections on Advances in Self Psychology”, in Ornstein, The Search for the Self, Vol. 3, op. cit., pp. 261–357.

36. Heinz Kohut, “Forms and Transformations of the Self”, in Ornstein, The Search for the Self, Vol. 1, op. cit., p. 451.

37. Heinz Kohut, “The Future of Psychoanalysis”, in Ornstein, The Search for the Self, Vol. 2, op. cit., p. 682.

38. Claudia Lapping, Psychoanalysis in Social Research: Shifting Theories and Reframing Concepts (London: Routledge, 2011).

39. Heinz Kohut, “Creativeness, Charisma, Group Psychology: Reflections on the Self-Analysis of Freud”, in Charles Strozier (ed.), Self Psychology and the Humanities: Reflections on a New Psychoanalytic Approach (London: W.W. Norton, 1985), pp. 205–208.

40. Wendt, in his constructivist approach, cites Kohut in conceptualising the state as a “group Self”. See Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 223.

41. Heinz Kohut, “On the Continuity of the Self and Cultural Selfobjects”, in Strozier, op. cit., pp. 232–243.

42. Peter Gay, Freud for Historians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).

43. Heinz Kohut, “On Courage”, in Ornstein, The Search for the Self, Vol. 3, op. cit., p. 167.

44. Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Routledge, 2001), p. 67.

45. Milan Zafirovski, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Authoritarianism: Puritanism, Democracy, and Society (New York: Springer, 2007).

46. Milan Zafirovski, “Protestantism and Authoritarianism: Weber’s Secondary Problem”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2010), p. 167.

47. Erik H. Erikson, Childhood and Society (London: Paladin Books, 1977), p. 235.

48. James Livingston, Against Thrift: Why Consumer Culture Is Good for the Economy, the Environment, and Your Soul (New York: Basic Books, 2011).

49. Russell Belk, “Possessions and the Extended Self”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 2 (1988), p. 159.

50. Ibid., p. 160.

51. Fred Penzel, “Hoarding in History”, in Randy O. Frost and Gail Steketee (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hoarding and Acquiring (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 6–16.

52. Thorstein Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 25.

53. Claes Belfrage, “For a Critical Engagement with Aesthetics in IPE: Revitalizing Economic Imagination in Times of Crisis”, International Politics, Vol. 49, No. 2 (2012), pp. 154–176.

54. Martijn Konings, “Imagined Double Movements: Progressive Thought and the Specter of Neoliberal Populism”, Globalizations, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2012), pp. 609–622; Konings, Emotional Logic of Capitalism, op. cit.

55. In 2010, polling data showed self-identified Tea Partiers as 18% of the population. See New York Times and CBS News, “Poll: National Survey of TPM Supporters”, The New York Times, available: <http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-timescbs-news-poll-national-survey-of-tea-party-supporters> (accessed 11 November 2015). A Gallup poll showed support for the movement at 32% in 2010. See Jim Norman, “In US, Support for Tea Party Drops to New Low”, Gallup, 26 October 2015, available: <http://www.gallup.com/poll/186338/support-tea-party-drops-new-low.aspx> (accessed 15 February 2016).

56. Benjamin Page and Lawrence Jacobs, Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

57. Konings, “Imagined Double Movements”, op. cit., p. 619.

58. Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williamson, The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

59. Clarence Lo, “Astroturf versus Grass Roots: Scenes from Early Tea Party Mobilization”, in Lawrence Rosenthal and Christine Trost (eds.), Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012), pp. 98–130.

60. Skocpol and Williamson, op. cit., p. 12.

61. Matt Barreto, Betsy Cooper, Benjamin Gonzalez, Christopher Parker and Christopher Towler, “The Tea Party in the Age of Obama: Mainstream Conservatism or Out-Group Anxiety?”, in Julian Go (ed.), Rethinking Obama (Bingley: Emerald, 2011), pp. 105–137.

62. Daniel Tope, Justin Pickett and Ted Chiricos, “Anti-minority Attitudes and Tea Party Movement Membership”, Social Science Research, Vol. 51 (2015), pp. 322–337.

63. Skocpol and Williamson, op. cit., p. 57.

64. George Lipsitz, The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2006), p. 1.

65. “Official Apologizes for Obama Chimpanzee Email”, CNN, 19 April 2011, available: <http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/19/california.apolgoy/> (accessed 19 March 2016).

66. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States, 2nd ed. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006), p. 2.

67. Knowles et al. found that implicit racial prejudice predicted opposition to this healthcare reform. See Eric Knowles, Brian Lowery and Rebecca Schaumberg, “Racial Prejudice Predicts Opposition to Obama and His Health Care Reform Plan”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 2 (2010), pp. 420–423.

68. William Parkin, Joshua Freilich and Steven Chermak, “Tea Party Mobilization and Power Devaluation”, Sociological Spectrum, Vol. 35, No. 4 (2015), pp. 329–348.

69. Meghan Burke, Race, Gender, and Class in the Tea Party (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015).

70. Michael Kimmel, Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era (New York: Nation Books, 2013), p. 65.

71. William Davis Eaton, Liberal Betrayal of America and the Tea Party Firestorm (Oakland, OR: Elderberry Press, 2010), p. 45.

72. William E. Connolly, “The Evangelical-Capitalist Resonance Machine”, Political Theory, Vol. 33, No. 6 (2005), pp. 869–886.

73. Garry Wills, Nixon Agonistes: The Crisis of the Self-Made Man (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1970), p. 555.

74. Thomas Ferguson and Joel Rogers, Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics (New York: Hill and Lang, 1986), p. 84.

75. Chip Berlet, “Reframing Populist Resentments in the Tea Party Movement”, in Rosenthal and Trost, op. cit., pp. 47–66.

76. Jill Lepore, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party’s Revolution and the Battle over American History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).

77. Skousen’s book became a bestseller in 2009, promoted by former Fox News conservative commentator Glenn Beck. See W. Cleon Skousen, The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle that Changed the World (Malta, ID: National Center for Constitutional Studies, 2006).

78. Lepore, op. cit., p. 16.

79. Charles Postel, “The Tea Party in Historical Perspective: A Conservative Response to a Crisis of Political Economy”, in Rosenthal and Trost, op. cit., pp. 25–46.

80. Abby Scher and Chip Berlet, “The Tea Party Moment”, in Nella Van Dyke and David S. Meyer (eds.), Understanding the Tea Party Movement (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016), p. 104.

81. Lydia Saad, “Tea Partiers Are Fairly Mainstream in Their Demographics”, Gallup, 5 April 2010, available: <http://www.gallup.com/poll/127181/tea-partiers-fairly-mainstream-demographics.aspx> (accessed 20 November 2015).

82. Skocpol and Williamson, op. cit., p. 57.

83. CNN and ORC International, “CNN/ORC International Poll”, CNN, 29 February 2016, available: <http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/02/29/rel4a.-.2016.primaries.pdf> (accessed 26 May 2016).

84. Paul Street and Anthony Dimaggio, Crashing the Tea Party: Mass Media and the Campaign to Remake American Politics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016).

85. Fifty-six per cent of Tea Partiers view them as consistent, compared to 36% of the general public. See Daniel Cox and Robert Jones, “Plurality of Americans Believe Capitalism at Odds with Christian Values”, Public Religion Research Institute, 20 April 2011, available: <http://publicreligion.org/research/2011/04/plurality-of-americans-believe-capitalism-at-odds-with-christian-values/> (accessed 2 November 2015).

86. Lisa Disch, “Tea Party Movement: The American ‘Precariat’?”, Representation, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2011), pp. 123–135.

87. Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for emphasising this point.

88. Lynne Layton, “Grandiosity, Neoliberalism, and Neoconservatism”, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, Vol. 34, No. 5 (2014), pp. 463–474.

89. Anne-Marie D'Aoust, “Ties that Bind? Engaging Emotions, Governmentality and Neoliberalism: Introduction to the Special Issue”, Global Society, Vol. 28, No. 3 (2014), p. 269.

90. Heinz Kohut, “The Psychoanalyst and the Historian”, in Strozier, op. cit., p. 218.

91. Corinne Bendersky, “Resolving Ideological Conflicts by Affirming Opponents’ Status: The Tea Party, Obamacare and the 2013 Government Shutdown”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 53 (2014), p. 167.

92. Lynne Layton, “Who’s Responsible? Our Mutual Implication in Each Other’s Suffering”, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2009), p. 109.