The effect of the ‘code of the street’ on street violence: Challenges for crime prevention

Abstract

The paper investigates the extent to which street violence in the United Kingdom can be explained by a ‘code of the street’ of the kind described by Anderson in his classic study of crime in the inner-city suburbs of Philadelphia. It draws on research conducted by the authors as part of an ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) project on violent street crime. The accounts of individual offences committed by over 100 street offenders indicate behaviour consistent with the idea of a behavioural code. In particular, offenders described the need to punish disrespect, to express violence overtly to avoid victimisation, to show self-reliance in resolving disputes and to maintain a frightening and formidable reputation. The implications of the existence of such a code for crime prevention are discussed. The study concludes that traditional methods of prevention based on surveillance and technology might be limited and something might be gained by looking at more innovative social and cultural approaches.

Keywords:

• street violence
• code of the street
• prevention

Acknowledgements

The research on which this article is based was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council for England and Wales (Award Number: RES-000-22-0398).

Notes

A.K. Cohen, Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang (New York: Free Press, 1955).

R. Clarke, Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (New York: Harrow & Heston, 1992).

B. Jacobs and R. Wright, ‘Stick-Up, Street Culture, and Offender Motivation’, Criminology 37 (1999), 149–73.

T.H. Bennett and F. Brookman, ‘Violent Street Crime: Making Sense of Seemingly Senseless Acts’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 22, no. 1–2 (2008), 171–80.

E. Anderson, Code of the Street: Decency, Violence and the Moral Life of the Inner City (New York: W.W. Norton, 1999).

F. Brookman, T.H. Bennett, A. Hochstetler, and H. Copes, ‘The “Code of the Street” and the Generation of Street Violence in the UK’, European Journal of Criminology 8, no. 1 (2011), 17–31.

N. Tilley, J. Smith, S. Finer, R. Erol, C. Charles and J. Dobby, Problem Solving Street Crime: Practical Lessons from the Street Crime Initiative (London: Home Office, 2004).

M. Barker, J. Geraghty, B. Webb and T. Key, The Prevention of Street Robbery. Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper 44 (London: Home Office, 1993).

A.M. Pate, M.A. Wycoff, W.G. Skogan and L.W. Sherman, Reducing Fear of Crime in Houston and Newark: A Summary Report (Washington, DC: Police Foundation, 1986).

E. Burney, Putting Street Crime in its Place: A Report to the Community/Police Consultative Group for Lambeth (London: Goldsmiths' College, 1990).

L.W. Sherman and D. Weisburd, ‘General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime Hot Spots: A Randomized Controlled Trial’, Justice Quarterly 12, no. 4 (1995), 635–48.

J.E. Stockdale and P.J. Gresham, Tackling Street Robbery: A Comparative Evaluation of Operation Eagle Eye. Police Research Group. Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 87 (London: Home Office, 1998).

N.E. Fearn, S.H. Decker and D. Curry, ‘Public Policy Responses to Gangs: Evaluations and Outcomes,’ in The Modern Gang Reader, ed. A. Egley, C.L. Maxson, J. Miller and M.W. Klein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

Centre for Social Justice, Dying to Belong: An In-Depth Review of Street Gangs in Britain (London: The Centre for Social Justice, 2009).

F.-A. Esbensen, ‘The National Evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) Program,’ in The Modern Gang Reader, ed. A. Egley, C.L. Maxson, J. Miller and M.W. Klein (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).