2,359
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice

&
Pages 99-116 | Published online: 17 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

This paper describes the development of an instrument—The Reflective Supervisor Questionnaire (RSQ). The RSQ maps the domain of research supervisory practice as a facilitative process involving educational tasks and activities. It is designed to assist research supervisors explore, by means of self‐reflection and reflection on feedback from others, how they practise supervision. In developing the RSQ 58 items were generated describing 5 hypothesised constructs derived from prior research. The resulting instrument was tested on postgraduate research students in 2 institutions. The questionnaire correlated highly with an established questionnaire supervision scale and with an overall satisfaction measure. Four factors identified in an exploratory analysis closely approximated the hypothesised constructs and extended the theoretical framework being developed. These 4 factors identified 4 subsets of facilitative supervisory practice: Progressing the Candidature, Mentoring, Coaching the Research Project, and Sponsoring Student Participation in Academic/Professional Practice. Issues in the interpretation of the findings and the possible usage in academic development programs of an instrument based on them are discussed.

Acknowledgements

This paper was presented in an earlier form to the SRHE Annual Conference in Glasgow in 2002. We would like to acknowledge the considerable contribution provided by our statistical advisor, Robin Collins of the Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, at The Australian National University. We would also like to acknowledge collegial commentary by colleagues at a seminar on this work at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Notes

* Corresponding author. Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, Linnaeus Cottage, Building 96, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Margot Pearson Footnote*

* Corresponding author. Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, Linnaeus Cottage, Building 96, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 335.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.