Abstract
Australia’s schooling systems, like many around the globe, are currently pursuing a ‘school improvement’ policy agenda. Schools, and school leaders, are under pressure to improve student achievement as measured through high-stakes testing, the results of which are often publicised with little contextual information attached. Research has identified the problematic nature of some potential responses to this performative policy agenda, including a narrowing of the curriculum, a focus on what is easily measurable, and a standardisation of teaching and learning approaches. This paper explores the local conditions and contexts that influence one school leader’s practices, and how those conditions have enabled this school to resist some of the more potentially problematic influences of these performative policies. Drawing upon a longitudinal case study and data including interviews and document analysis, this paper provides insights into the ways school leaders might be able to lead towards a vision of education that differs from the narrow measures currently emphasised within performative school improvement policies.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes on contributor
Amanda McKay is a lecturer in Leadership in the Faculty of Education at Monash University, Australia. Formerly a school principal, she has a particular interest in the work of public school principals in relation to policy enactment, school improvement, and the changing nature of the Principalship. Her other research interests include leadership for social justice, leadership in rural and remote schools, and the working lives of school principals.