Coping trajectories in later life: A 20-year predictive study

Abstract

Objectives and method: Information about aging-related change in coping is limited mainly to results of cross-sectional studies of age differences in coping, and no research has focused on predictors of aging-related change in coping behavior. To extend research in this area, we used longitudinal multilevel modeling to describe older adults’ (n = 719; baseline M = 61 years) 20-year, intraindividual approach and avoidance coping trajectories, and to determine the influence of two sets of predictors (threat appraisal and stressor characteristics; gender and baseline personal and social resources) on level and rate of change in these trajectories.

Results: Over the 20-year study interval, participants declined in the use of approach coping and most avoidance coping strategies, but there was significant variation in this trend. In simultaneous predictive models, female gender, more threat appraisal, stressor severity, social resources, and depressive symptoms, and fewer financial resources were independently associated with higher initial levels of coping responses. Having more social resources, and fewer financial resources, at baseline in late-middle-age predicted faster decline over time in approach coping. Having more baseline depressive symptoms, and fewer baseline financial resources, hastened decline in use of avoidance coping. Independent of other variables in these models, decline over time in approach coping and avoidance coping remained statistically significant.

Conclusion: Overall decline in coping may be a normative pattern of coping change in later life. However, it also is modifiable by older adults’ stressor appraisals, their stressors, and the personal and social resources they possess at entry to later life, in late-middle-age.

Keywords:

• coping
• stress
• older adults
• longitudinal trajectories

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grants AA15685 and AA017477, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service Funds, and Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliation. The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent those of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. We thank Bernice Moos for her assistance with data collection and processing, and Sonya SooHoo for assistance with manuscript preparation.