347
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Test Your Memory (TYM) as a screening instrument in clinical practice – the Polish validation study

, &
Pages 863-868 | Received 05 Nov 2012, Accepted 08 Mar 2013, Published online: 05 Apr 2013
 

Abstract

Objectives: The Test Your Memory (TYM) test is a short, self-administered screening cognitive instrument designed for the detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study was aimed to examine the Polish version of TYM as a screening instrument in Polish clinical practice.

Method: In this study 199 patients were assessed whereas 131 patients with AD and mild cognitive impairments (MCI) and 94 healthy control subjects took part in the final analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the TYM test were evaluated among the AD group and healthy control group. The TYM test was compared to other neuropsychological tests, such as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), DemTect and Verbal Fluency Test (FAS).

Results: The average TYM score in healthy control group: 45.4, 40.9 in the MCI patients and 23.4 in AD patients. The Polish version of the TYM test showed good correlation with other neuropsychological instruments among AD patients. Participants aged ≥75 and those with primary education performed significantly worse in TYM. The TYM achieved the best differentiation between AD and the healthy control group for ≤39 cut-off with a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 90%, respectively.

Conclusion: The Polish version of the TYM test is a useful instrument and may be seen as an alternative to the MMSE screening test in clinical practice in patients with dementia. However, the normative data suggested that the age and the level of education of the respondents should be considered as important factors affecting the interpretation of the final score.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Jerry Brown, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK, for making the TYM test available for the study. The authors received no funding for this article.

Notes

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001 compared with HC.

# p < 0.01, ## p < 0.0001 compared with MCI.

* p < 0.001, **p < 0.0001 compared with MCI

* p < 0.003 compared with 65–74 years old.

# p < 0.001 compared with secondary and higher level.

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001 compared with HC.

# p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.0001 compared with MCI.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.