719
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psychological Morbidity and Emotional Well-Being

‘Factors affecting services offered to older adults with psychological morbidity: an exploration of health professional attitudes’

, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 132-139 | Received 10 Mar 2017, Accepted 08 Oct 2017, Published online: 06 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Aim: Poor collaboration between the multiple services involved in hospital discharge planning may contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes post discharge. This study aimed to explore clinician (medical, allied health and nursing) attitudes towards the management of the older patient with psychological morbidity during and following hospitalization.

Methods: Focus groups were held with 54 health professionals comprising of 7 from acute, 20 from subacute (geriatric assessment and rehabilitation), and 27 from community care settings. A qualitative study using focus groups of clinicians from a range of disciplines working within a large Australian health care service. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach with constant comparison.

Results: Key themes included: (1) Clinician decision making towards psychological morbidity; (2) Supply of people with specialised skills dealing with psychological morbidity; (3) Confidence and capability; (4) Facilitating continuity of care; and (5) Perception of depression and aging.

Conclusions: Clinicians across healthcare settings are uniquely placed to identity psychological morbidity in older patients and make appropriate referrals for support. Management and referral making for older patients with psychological morbidity can be enhanced by routine education for clinicians and the introduction of clinical pathways. This has potential to improve management of psychological morbidity; however, evaluation of impact on patient outcome is required. Specifically, there is a need for greater access for counselling services.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants in the study and Monash Health and Monash University who also supported the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the 2001 Beyondblue National Priority Research Program, Application 00241.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.