3,217
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Age differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation: a systematic review

&
Pages 1-14 | Received 02 May 2017, Accepted 16 Oct 2017, Published online: 17 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This review examines differences in the use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies among younger and older adults.

Method: A systematic review using search terms related to ageing and ER identified 23 relevant studies. Narrative synthesis was adopted to analyse the findings.

Results: Generally, greater use of situation selection and attentional deployment was identified among older adults, although these relationships were dependent on contextual/moderator variables. While older adults employed greater levels of situation modification in response to negative stimuli, there was considerable variation in age differences across specific situation modification subtypes. Available evidence pointed to an absence of age differences in the cognitive change strategy of cognitive reappraisal. The use of relatively less-cognitively demanding cognitive change subtypes (e.g. acceptance) was, under particular circumstances, greater among older adults. Findings regarding the response modulation strategy of expressive suppression were equivocal.

Conclusion: Adult development is not characterised by straightforward shifts in preferences for use of different ER strategies. Moderator variables appear to be of central importance in shaping the emergence of age differences in ER. Systematically examining interactions of age with individual difference variables and situational factors in samples including oldest-old adults will be important for advancing knowledge regarding developmental differences in ER.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Notes

1. Our modified version of the Downs and Black Quality Checklist (Citation1998) included items 1-3, 5-7, 10-12, 16, 18, 20, 25, & 27. Items 4, 8, 9, 13-15, 17, 19, 21-24, & 26 were excluded.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research [grant number CE1101029].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.