Abstract
Objectives: Being alone is often equated with loneliness. Yet, recent findings suggest that the objective state of being alone (i.e. solitude) can have both positive and negative connotations. The present research aimed to examine (1) affective experience in daily solitude; and (2) the association between everyday affect in solitude and well-being. We examined the distinct roles of culture and immigration in moderating these associations.
Method: Using up to 35 daily life assessments of momentary affect, solitude, and emotional well-being in two samples (Canada and China), the study compared older adults who aged in place (local Caucasians in Vancouver , Canada and local Hong Kong Chinese in Hong Kong, China) and older adults of different cultural heritages who immigrated to Canada (immigrated Caucasians and immigrated East Asians).
Results: We found that older adults of East Asian heritage experienced more positive and less negative affect when alone than did Caucasians. Reporting positive affect in solitude was more positively associated with well-being in older adults who had immigrated to Canada as compared to those who had aged in place.
Conclusions:These findings speak to the unique effects of culture and immigration on the affective correlates of solitude and their associations with well-being in old age.
Keywords:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 Due to historical reasons (e.g., the handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997), many older adults who are currently living in Vancouver, Canada emigrated from China. In Metro Vancouver (B.C.), Canada, more than 30% of immigrants are from Chinese cities (Metro Vancouver, 2011). Other older adults, meanwhile, emigrated from Western cultures, such as European countries and the United States.
2 Forty out of the 43 East Asians were from China.
3 Young-old local Caucasians: b = −.15, SE = .10, t = −1.48, p = .15, 95% CI = [−.36, .06]; old-old local Caucasians: b = −.17, SE = .22, t = −.76, p = .45, 95% CI = [−.62, .28]; young-old immigrated Caucasians: b = −.02, SE = .22, t = −.11, p = .92, 95% CI = [−.48, .44]; young-old immigrated East Asians: b = .12, SE = .19, t = .67, p = .51, 95% CI = [−.26, .50].