1,137
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Physical Health & Fraility

High coping self-efficacy associated with lower odds of pre-frailty/frailty in older adults with chronic disease

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 1956-1962 | Received 12 Mar 2019, Accepted 29 Jun 2019, Published online: 10 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives

Frailty affects an estimated 15% of community dwelling older adults. Few studies look at psychosocial variables like self-efficacy (confidence to perform well at a particular task or life domain) in relation to frailty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between pre-frailty/frailty and self-efficacy.

Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled community dwelling older adults 65 and older (N = 146) with at least one chronic condition. Scales included: 5-item FRAIL scale (including measures of Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of weight); coping self-efficacy used to measure confidence in one’s ability to problem solve, emotionally regulate and ask for support when problems in life occur; illness intrusiveness; patient health questionnaire to assess depressive symptoms; financial strain; life events count; social support; heart rate; tobacco use and body mass index. Logistic regression was used for model development.

Results

Roughly half (49.3%) of the participants were frail/pre-frail. High coping self-efficacy was associated with a 92% decreased odds of pre-frailty/frailty after adjustment for age, sex, race, co-morbidities, heart rate, a life events count, and body mass index. This relationship remained significant when illness intrusiveness and depression scores were added to the model (OR: 0.10; p-value = 0.014). Increases in age, co-morbidities, heart rate and body mass index were also significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of pre-frailty/frailty.

Conclusions

High coping self-efficacy was associated with greater odds of a robust state. Further consideration should be given to coping self-efficacy in frailty research and intervention development.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Gayle Page, Svetlana Bautista and Christine Leyden for their contributions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by: (1) National Institute of Health Pre-doctoral Fellowship, Clinical and Translational Science Award (4TL1TR001078-04), (2) Dr. Scholl Foundation Fellowship, (3) National Institute of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research Pre-doctoral Fellowship, Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Health Research (T32NR012704), (4) National Institute of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research Intramural Research Program and (5) Johns Hopkins University Provost’s Post-Doctoral Fellowship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.