788
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cognition and Risk

Poverty increases the risk of incident cognitive impairment among older adults: a longitudinal study in China

&
Pages 1822-1827 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 31 Aug 2019, Published online: 09 Sep 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: With a longitudinal design, we aimed to investigate the relationship between poverty and the risk of incident cognitive impairment in China.

Methods: We used three waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (2008–2014). Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Chinese version of the Mini Mental State Examination. Poverty was measured according to the latest national poverty line settled at an annual per-capita income of 2300 yuan (approximately equivalent to 1.25 dollar/day) in 2011 in China. A marginal structural model was utilized to explore the association between poverty and the risk of incident cognitive impairment. The subgroup analyses were also conducted in this study.

Results: The cumulative incidence of cognitive impairment over 6 years was 30.69% (1936/6309). Poverty increased 34% risk of incident cognitive impairment in the elderly (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15–1.56) after controlling behavioral factors and health status covariates. Participants who were male (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08–1.76), lived in urban areas (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.22–1.98), and were married (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.28–2.32) had higher poverty risks on incident cognitive impairment in subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: Our results provide empirical support for the ongoing discussion about how economic hardship impacts of cognitive functioning, and highlight the negative health risks that economically disadvantaged individuals may experience.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CLHLS data managed by the Centre for Healthy Aging and Family Studies at Peking University. All authors designed the study. L. Chen and Q. Cao conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M632285), the Postdoctoral Research Funding Program of Jiangsu Province (1701078C), and the Jiangsu Province Social Science Fund Project (18SHC006).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.