788
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mood, Stress & Social Support

Development of the ‘SNS older adults measure’ (SNS-OA) to examine social network site use in older adults

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 68-77 | Received 11 Jun 2019, Accepted 24 Sep 2019, Published online: 11 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives

Social Networking Sites (SNSs) may ameliorate loneliness in later life but no measure of SNS use for this population exists. This study describes the development of the ‘SNS Older Adults measure’ (SNS-OA), to improve understanding of older adults’ SNS use and its relationship to social wellbeing.

Methods

The SNS-OA underwent initial development, including literature reviews and consultation with target population (n = 9) and experts (n = 9); piloting (n = 74), and evaluation of psychometric properties (n = 263).

Results

The final measure comprised three ‘motive’ scales (using SNSs to maintain close ties, maintain and strengthen weaker ties and diversion), and two ‘affect’ scales (positive/negative). Whilst many items were weakly endorsed by participants, the measure demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach α = 0.85; ICC = 0.82) and some convergent validity, with some subscales correlating with a personality measure in hypothesised directions. No statistically significant correlations were observed between the measure and social wellbeing.

Conclusions

Despite the measure’s limitations, this research has enabled a better understanding of SNS use in older adults and has important implications for research in this area. Findings also suggest a complex relationship between social wellbeing and SNS use in later life.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London and Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula for supporting this research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Thank you to Robert Stenton for all his help with web development.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (grant number: IS-BRC-1215-20018).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.