479
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Long Term Care

Residential aged care staff perceptions and responses towards neuropsychiatric symptoms: a mixed methods analysis of electronic healthcare records

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 243-250 | Received 27 Jul 2021, Accepted 11 Jan 2022, Published online: 31 Jan 2022
 

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate electronic care notes to better understand reporting and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) by residential aged care (RAC) staff.

Methods

We examined semi-structured care notes from electronic healthcare notes of 77 residents (67% female; aged 67–101; 79% with formal dementia diagnosis) across three RAC facilities. As part of standard clinical practice, staff documented the NPS presentation and subsequent management amongst residents. Using a mixed-method approach, we analyzed the type of NPS reported and explored care staff responses to NPS using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

465 electronic care notes were recorded during the 18-month period. Agitation-related behaviors were most frequently reported across residents (48.1%), while psychosis (15.6%), affective symptoms (14.3%), and apathy (1.3%) were less often reported. Only 27.5% of the notes contained information on potential causes underlying NPS. When faced with NPS, care staff responded by either providing emotional support, meeting resident’s needs, removing identified triggers, or distracting.

Conclusion

Results suggest that RAC staff primarily detected and responded to those NPS they perceived as distressing. Findings highlight a potential under-recognition of specific NPS types, and lack of routine examination of NPS causes or systematic assessment and management of NPS. These observations are needed to inform the development and implementation of non-pharmacological interventions and care programs targeting NPS in RAC.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2032597 .

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Data availability statement

Data used in this study cannot be shared because of confidential information.

Additional information

Funding

Alzheimer Nederland; Australian Research Council; Alzheimer Nederland and Memorabel ZonMw; NHMRC and Australian Research Council Dementia Research Development Fellowship; Vereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.