Mediating between state and citizens: the significance of the informal politics of third-party representation in the global south

Abstract

This article argues that we should take more seriously the role of intermediaries in relationships between states and citizens in the global south. More specifically it holds that the practice of mediation, the third party representation of citizens to states and vice versa, is a widespread and important political practice in this context. Largely distinct from the contentious politics and popular mobilisation of social movements, mediation is more a politics of negotiation and bargaining by representatives. Developed as an emergent analysis from multiple case studies, mediation is a broad concept that includes practices that at other times might be described as lobbying, clientelism and coercion, but that we conceptualise in terms of claiming legitimacy to speak for the poor and marginalised, and theorise in terms of a democratic deficit between formal political institutions and these groups. In addition to identifying different kinds of mediators, the article categorises mediation in terms of the orientation and nature of various mediatory practices. Lastly, the article identifies at least three explanations for mediation including the endurance of pre-democratic political relations and practices, new forms of social exclusion in post-colonial democracies and the erosion of state authority brought about by neo-liberal policies and globalisation.

Keywords:

• representation
• state–society relations
• clientelism
• democratic deficit
• citizenship

Disclosure statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article

Notes

^1. See http://epress.utsc.utoronto.ca/cord/.

^2. See http://www.jannswenner.com/archives/Bono.aspx; http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/17/bono-africans-stealing-voice-poor.