66
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Comparison of two strategies for the administration of injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: among women who returned to a family planning clinic at three- or six-month intervals

, , , &
Pages 408-411 | Received 16 Mar 2016, Accepted 20 Jul 2016, Published online: 17 Aug 2016
 

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in women who received injections every 3 months at the Family Planning Clinic, and those who received every other injection at a health care facility near their place of residence, only returning to the clinic every 6 months.

Materials and methods: The medical charts of DMPA users from 2 January 1980 through 31 December 2012 were evaluated for this study. Two cohorts of women were created and compared: those who regularly received DMPA injections every 3 months (3-month group) at the clinic and those who received alternating 3-month injections at a health care facility near their residence house, returning to the clinic every 6 months for an injection (6-month group). In addition, effectiveness rates, reasons for discontinuation, and continuation rates were evaluated.

Results: Overall, 2637 women received all injections at 3-month intervals at the clinic, and 1190 women received every other injection at a health care facility near their residence. The women in the 3-month group had higher pregnancy rates and higher discontinuation rates (with the exception of discontinuation due to the loss of libido).

Conclusion: The women who received alternating injections near their homes were more likely to continue using DMPA as a contraception method and presented lower pregnancy and discontinuation rates (for the majority of reasons), when compared to those women who returned to the clinic every 3 months.

Chinese abstract

目的: 本研究的目的是比较长效醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)在两类妇女中的临床效果, 一类妇女是每3个月到计划生育门诊接受注射, 另一类是只在6个月到计划生育门诊复诊一次, 其他时间在居住地附近卫生保健机构接受注射。

材料与方法: 本研究对1980年1月2日到2012 年1月31日之间使用DMPA的妇女的医疗记录进行评估。这些妇女分为两组并比较: 一组是每3个月规律到门诊接受DMPA注射(3月组), 另一组是每六个月回到门诊接受一次注射, 同时在居住地附近的卫生保健机构接受另外一次3个月的注射。并对有效率, 停药的原因, 和续用率进行评价。

结果: 总共2637名妇女每隔3个月到门诊接受一次注射。1190名妇女在她们住所附近的卫生保健机构接受另外的注射。3个月组的妇女有更高的妊娠率和更高的停药率(除外因性欲减退产生的停药率)。

结论: 和每3个月回到门诊一次的妇女相比, 选择在住所附近接受另外一次注射的妇女更愿意持续应用DMPA作为避孕方法, 妊娠率和停药率(由于大多数原因)都比较低。

Disclosure statement

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Funding

This study received partial financial support from the National Research Council (CNPq) [grant #573747/2008-3].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.