Abstract
This paper reports on the aims and objectives of professional instrumental teachers working at a wide variety of levels. Questionnaire data are analysed and discussed with the aim of developing a deeper understanding of the ideologies of instrumental teachers in relation to performance, music analysis and teaching. Direct comparisons are made between the aims and objectives revealed by instrumental teachers and those expressed by leading educationalists, performers and examination boards, resulting in many assumptions being challenged. In addition, preliminary conclusions are drawn regarding the methodologies of instrumental teachers with specific reference to music analysis.
Notes
In reality [ACA] is neither accepted nor approved by the majority of teachers who—if the grapevine means anything—would sooner have nothing to do with it (http://freespace.virgin.net/chris.allen9/ACA.htm)
Additional information provided by the ISM states that applicants either must hold a recognized qualification and be supported by one reference from another ISM member, or provide evidence of having successfully taught the instrument/voice/subject for a minimum of 4 h per week for not less than 5 years and be supported by two references from ISM members (ISM information sheet; Private Teachers Section).