382
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparative Seismic Fragility Analysis of Conventional and Base Isolated Hospital Buildings Having Different Structural Systems

& ORCID Icon
Pages 2491-2513 | Received 03 Dec 2018, Accepted 05 May 2020, Published online: 05 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

After the 2010 Maule earthquake, Chilean authorities now require the implementation of base isolation systems in new public hospital build-ings. However, in Chile the typical seismic force-resisting system of non-isolated hospitals is made up of reinforced concrete shear walls, whereas that of isolated buildings is made up of reinforced concrete frames. Since the former is much stiffer than the latter, there is then a question on the actual effectiveness of base isolation in reducing the seismic demands on new hospitals with respect to that on conventional hospitals, particularly the interstory drift demand under relatively low levels of ground shaking. Motivated by this context, this study evaluates the main results of a comparative analysis of the seismic performance of isolated and non-isolated hospitals considering the typical structural system in each case. Representative structural layouts were defined for both types of hospital buildings based on the Chilean state of the practice. Further, possible influence of the number of stories was considered. Member sizes and isolation system properties were determined in accordance to the current Chilean seismic design codes. The structural models were subjected to nonlinear time history analyses under two simultaneous horizontal components of ground motions selected from the Chilean database of earthquake records. The seismic response was evaluated through fragility curves, which were developed from results given by incremental dynamic analysis. Several limit states associated with the isolation systems, structural elements and nonstructural components of hospitals were considered. Results are compared with empirical observations on the effects of earthquakes on the Chilean building inventory, and the suitability of limit state thresholds defined in the literature is discussed.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper was financially supported by CONICYT through its program CONICYT-PCHA/MagisterNacional/2015-22151021. The authors are grateful to Rodrigo Jordan of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile and Henry Sady of SIRVE Seismic Protection Technologies (Santiago, Chile) for providing information on Chilean hospital buildings and valuable comments on the Chilean structural engineering practice. Further support was provided by the Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CIGIDEN) ANID FONDAP 15110017 (Santiago, Chile). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 258.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.