ABSTRACT
Ceilings, windows, and wall tiles were installed in a 3-story reinforced concrete structure subjected to shake-table tests. Alternative detailing for each type was used to evaluate their impact on seismic performance. The ceiling built using conventional detailing had no catastrophic damage but incurred crushing of plasterboards, creating a gap between the ceiling and the surrounding beams. For sliding windows, damage which could cause injuries was not observed, whereas glass cracking was observed for fixed windows. For tiles, the use of organic adhesive prevented tiles from falling, compared to the use of mortar where tile spalling was observed.
Acknowledgments
The present work is supported by the Tokyo Metropolitan Resilience Project of the National Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED). Furthermore, the authors would like to express their gratitude to Kirii Construction Materials Co., Ltd. for providing the ceiling material, Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd. for providing the plasterboard, and to LIXIL Corporation for providing the windows and tiles.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).