ABSTRACT
Criteria lists of academic skills are widely used to assess the work readiness of people who are looking to enter or re-enter the apprenticeship market. These instruments represent a particular hurdle in the path to vocational training for low-skilled would-be trainees. We investigate the validity of one such list used in Germany. As different workplaces have diverse requirements, we question whether the same criteria hold for various professions. The study surveyed 538 trainees enrolled in vocational training programmes in eight different professions. Participants were asked about the requirements of their professions with respect to the minimum standards (as specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness) for work readiness. The results showed that the trainees consider the requirements during training to be lower than the minimum standards specified in the German Catalogue of Criteria for Apprenticeship Readiness and that substantial heterogeneity in requirements exists both between and within professions. We argue that criteria lists, which are also used in other countries in similar ways, should be treated with caution, as they might not be able to predict would-be trainees’ readiness to successfully complete an apprenticeship programme due to enormous variability in job requirements.
Disclosure statement
The author(s) report that they have no financial and/or business interests in a company that may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed paper.
Notes
1. In order to test whether the KKA scores differed depending on respondents’ year of training, we ran an additional profession × KKA criterion × year of training (end of first vs. second or third year of training) ANOVA. The results revealed no statistically significant effects involving year of training.