Abstract
The skills debate in many European countries has for many years been preoccupied with the supply of qualified individuals and participation in training events. However, recent case‐study work suggests that qualifications and training are partial measures of skill development as most learning arises naturally out of the demands and challenges of everyday work experience and interactions with colleagues, clients and customers. This paper argues that the ‘learning as acquisition’ and ‘learning as participation’ metaphors aptly capture these two competing intellectual traditions. The paper outlines an experiment that was designed to give the ‘learning as participation’ metaphor a firmer survey basis than it has hitherto enjoyed. The results highlight the importance of social relationships and mutual support in enhancing individual performance at work, factors which individual acquisition of qualifications and attendance on courses ignores. The paper also confirms the importance of job design in promoting and facilitating learning at work.
Acknowledgements
The Learning at Work Survey was launched as a collaborative venture between a team of researchers at the Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester, and the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education. This collaboration forms part of an Economic and Social Research Council research project set up to investigate the factors that facilitate learning at work and funded under the Teaching and Learning Research Programme (RES‐139–25–0110). We would like to thank colleagues at NIACE for initiating the collaboration and providing valuable advice in the construction of the survey. We are particularly grateful to Fiona Aldridge, Alan Tuckett, Peter Lavender, Veronica McGivney and Naomi Sargant. However, the usual caveat applies in that responsibility for the views reported here lies with the authors.