1,013
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An evaluation of mixed methods (diaries and focus groups) when working with older people

&
Pages 389-401 | Received 29 Sep 2011, Accepted 26 Jul 2012, Published online: 11 Sep 2012
 

Abstract

This paper considers the advantages and limitations of using mixed methods, diaries and focus groups in research with older people, specifically research investigating the interaction experiences of older individuals as customers, members and workers with public-, private- and community-based organisations. Drawing on the literature on mixed method integration, five distinct advantages were identified: development, completeness, expansion, offsetting and initiation. Two limitations were also noted: demands of the data collection on the participants and insufficient depth. Each is discussed in the context of the particular research project, with the suggestion that mixed methods be used in future research with older people.

Acknowledgement

This study used data from the research project ‘Engaging senior stakeholders: Positive ageing at the elder organisation interface’ funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, New Zealand, contract 20169-BIS-UOW.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 323.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.