ABSTRACT
This paper contrasts mixed methods design with strategic research design. Mixed methods research both advocates for itself as always better than singular research methods, while also seemingly allowing a wide variety of researchers to count their work under the very large umbrella of mixed methods. We argue for strategic research design as a set of principles that can help researchers decide whether to use mixed methods, choose the best methods to mix and the order to mix them in. Drawing on an actual case study of a mixed methods research project, we show the importance of realist epistemology, available resources, and the research situation in guiding the selection and mixing of research methods.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their appreciation to all those involved in the research, and to anonymous reviewers from the International Journal of Social Research for comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Randy Stoecker
Randy Stoecker is a Professor in the Department of Community and Environmental Sociology at the University of Wisconsin, with an affiliate appointment at the Center for Community and Economic Development. He has a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Minnesota, and an M.S. in Counseling from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. He practices, conducts trainings, writes, and speaks on community organizing and development, community-based participatory research/evaluation, higher education community engagement strategies, and community information technology.
Elisa Avila
Elisa Avila is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Community and Environmental Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has an M.A. from the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on race, community, and urban sociology with an emphasis on place-based social processes.