Publication Cover
Ethics, Place & Environment
A Journal of Philosophy & Geography
Volume 8, 2005 - Issue 1
318
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

On the intellectual origins of the ecological crisis: towards a gestalt solution

Pages 95-111 | Published online: 07 Oct 2010
 

Abstract

What are the intellectual origins of the ecological crisis? Which approach can offer an alternative? In the first part of this paper, I argue that the crisis was caused not by faith in reason as such, but instead by distortions of reason. Further, I consider the intellectual prerequisites for ecological destruction, the ultimate cause of which can be seen in the transitional state of our civilisation from a dependent to an interdependent mode of interaction with the biosphere. A possible remedy to this can be the reconciliation of humankind with the biosphere by means of the Gestalt approach.

Notes

 Contrary to this, Lomborg (Citation2001) claims that the current environmental destruction is not a crisis, because similar changes have already happened in the Earth's history (e.g. the Ice Age, giant meteorite impacts, etc.) without destroying the Earth. However, even though there is indeed no threat to the stability of the biosphere at a geological scale, there clearly is a threat at the human (local) scale. The very real danger that our species, Homo sapiens, may eventually become extinct as a consequence of environmental destruction should certainly be enough to characterise the current situation as a ‘crisis’ (Gould, Citation1994, p. 49; Foster, Citation1998, pp. 5–7). The ongoing environmental destruction, if not averted in the coming decades, will have irreversible consequences for the Earth's biosphere and humankind (White, Citation1967; Adam, Citation1993, p. 399; Buell, Citation1995, pp. 280–302; Harvey, Citation1996, p. 194).

 This interaction between the noosphere and the biosphere brings to mind the relation between mind and body, which it seems to parallel. There is, however, a difference: the mind is a necessity for the human organism, while the noosphere is not a necessity for the biosphere. The mind has some control over voluntary body functions, which is not the case with the biosphere.

 It was once believed that Amazonian Indians lived in peace and harmony with nature, but this bon-sauvage impression was changed after they obtained Western weapons and started to destroy their game (Goulding et al., Citation2000).

 To realise how traumatic this alienation actually was, one has only to remember Blaise Pascal's image of a ‘thinking reed’, desperately lonely in an alien universe, whose infinity was only the infinity of strangeness (Pascal, Citation1995, p. 347).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 390.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.