208
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Social Desirability Influences on Judgements of Biotechnology Across the Dimensions of Risk, Ethicality and Naturalness

, , &
Pages 989-1003 | Published online: 19 Oct 2007
 

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between social desirability and dimensional judgments of risk, naturalness and ethicality for biotechnological and matched natural health technologies. We examine if those who are motivated to respond in a socially‐desirable way will be more likely to rate genetically‐modified (GM) technologies as more risky (less natural or ethical) than those who are not motivated to respond in a socially‐desirable way. One‐hundred and forty‐eight participants rated eight technologies along three dimensions (risk, naturalness and ethicality) and completed a measure of social desirability. The results showed that ethicality was unrelated to social desirability. The dimension of naturalness was related to social desirability regardless of the type of technology. The results further showed that for GM technologies those motivated to respond in a socially desirable way rated these as more risky. Theoretical and methodological implications are drawn from the study.

Notes

1. Numbers in the actual analyses varied due to missing data. Exact Ns are given for each analysis. For the whole sample the Marlowe‐Crowne scale had a mean of 5.1 and an SD of 2.0. The reduced sample for the analyses of the risk dimension this was 5.3 with an SD of 1.9 which was not statistically different from 5.1 (t (110) = 1.2, p = .23). Similarly for the reduced sample for the ethicality judgments the mean was 5.1 with an SD of 2.0 which was not statistically different from 5.1 (t (112) = 0.2, p = .83). Finally, for the reduced sample for the naturalness judgments the mean was 5.2 with an SD of 2.0 which was not statistically different from 5.1 (t (108) = 0.42, p = .67). Thus the results reported are not due to the reduced samples affecting the nature of the distribution of scores on the Marlowe‐Crowne scale.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 420.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.