499
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Risk perception and social vulnerability to earthquakes in Grenoble (French Alps)

, , , &
Pages 1245-1260 | Received 23 Dec 2010, Accepted 14 Dec 2011, Published online: 18 Jan 2012
 

Abstract

The city of Grenoble (French Alps) is characterized by a rather low seismicity as well as a tectonic context prone to the occurrence of major earthquakes (M = 6). The population is therefore not used to experiencing earthquakes: this can lead to a low culture of risk, which may imply a rather high vulnerability of the population. Consequently, it is necessary to better evaluate vulnerability and to find ways of reducing it. Social vulnerability is usually evaluated through surveys focusing on residential population. When these studies are carried out by geographers, they sometimes take into account a spatial dimension by mapping the results. Here, a temporal dimension is also integrated and residents as well as users of the city, i.e. users with any activity as working, shopping, having leisure time, etc. are surveyed. The method consists in building a social and spatial representative sample through three dimensions: social (age), temporal (hour of the day) and spatial (place of residence or activity). For this reason the household travel survey was used to build the sample. The risk perception survey shows that only 16% of the sample feel exposed to earthquakes. The youngest, most qualified, the students and working people seem to better know the adequate safety measures to be taken in case of an earthquake. Besides classic statistical analyses, the answers to the questionnaire were synthesized into a vulnerability index. Once more, the most qualified are characterized by a lower vulnerability. The cartography of the survey results provides interesting conclusions for authorities in charge of risk mitigation, who could then concentrate their preventive information campaign on certain districts or social groups. Among other conclusions, these maps highlight the gap between the physical vulnerability of buildings and the confidence of the population in their resistance in case of an earthquake.

Acknowledgement

This study was co-financed by the Conseil Général de l'Isère (Isere Département General Council), through the Pôle Grenoblois des Risques Naturels (Grenoble Centre for Natural Risks), and through the pôle Terre-UNivers-Environnement-Société (Earth-Universe-Environment-Society) of Grenoble's Joseph Fourier University.

Notes

1. Source: INSEE census, 2008.

2. The surveyed persons have to evaluate their feeling when being exposed to six natural risks (avalanche, fire, rockfall, earthquake, storm and flood) in the city of Grenoble. The scale ranges from 0 to 4 (0 when the surveyed persons do not feel exposed and 4 when they feel very much exposed).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 420.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.