519
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Religious-body affirmations protect body esteem for women who base self-worth on appearance or others’ approval

, &
Pages 98-111 | Received 11 Jan 2015, Accepted 22 Oct 2015, Published online: 16 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Women who base their self-worth on appearance or others’ approval are especially vulnerable to low body esteem when they view media images of thin models. We explored one way religion might mitigate the harmful media effects in these women. We tested whether basing self-worth on appearance or others’ approval was positively related to body comparisons and body surveillance. We tested whether reading religious body-affirming statements enhanced feelings of being loved, which would increase body esteem in women who base self-worth on appearance or others’ approval. This experiment manipulated the type of body-affirming statements (religious, spiritual, control) and assessed women's body esteem before and after they viewed thin models. Results showed basing self-worth on appearance or others’ approval was positively related to body comparisons and surveillance. Furthermore, reading religious body-affirmations increased feeling loved, which in turn increased weight esteem in women who based self-worth on appearance or others’ approval.

Acknowledgement

We thank Konner Nelson and Michael Morton for their assistance with data collection.

Notes

1. Because random assignment was compromised when selecting women concerned about others’ approval, we compared conditions on key variables. Preliminary analyses revealed the conditions were equivalent in terms of BMI, importance of religion, and initial body esteem. That is, oneway (condition) ANOVAs showed the groups did not differ in BMI (M = 22.4 to M = 23.2, p = .84), religious importance (M = 3.08 to M = 3.42, p = .52), Time 1 weight esteem (M = 12.0 to M = 12.3, p = .98), and Time 1 appearance esteem (M = 39.3 to M = 41.7, p = .81). Similarly, selecting women strongly concerned with appearance compromised random assignment, yet additional analyses showed that conditions were comparable in BMI (M = 22.4 to M = 24.6, p = .38), religious importance (M = 3.00 to M = 3.15, p = .90), Time 1 weight esteem (M = 11.6 to M = 12.3, p = .88), and Time 1 appearance esteem (M = 38.5 to M = 41.2, p = .64).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 286.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.