509
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gendered forms of responsibility and control in teenagers' views of alcohol

, &
Pages 794-808 | Received 18 Jul 2014, Accepted 24 Nov 2014, Published online: 02 Jan 2015
 

Abstract

There has been a shift in the most recent UK Government's Alcohol Strategy (2012) from personal responsibility towards a model of shared responsibility for young people's drinking. On closer examination of the strategy, however, it appears that rather than exonerating young people from blame, governance is merely extended to include wider partners. Using findings from nine focus groups with young people in Liverpool, UK, we explore who they believe are responsible for their drinking behaviours and how they learn to become ‘good drinkers’. Our findings show that while teenagers were aware of dominant alcohol-related messages and maintained a moral position as responsible citizens; they also negotiated and resisted norms about teenage drinking. Although both boys and girls agreed that parents were the primary responsible authority for regulating their drinking, there was gendered disagreement about personal responsibility. The girls described how they were ultimately responsible for any adverse consequences if they drank too much whilst the boys considered a wide range of partners who would be implicated. However, unlike the girls, the boys described a willingness to either abstain or moderate their alcohol intake in order to remain in control and avoid any alcohol-related trouble or harm.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the respondents and schools for taking part in this research.

Disclosure statement

The study was funded jointly by the Liverpool Health Inequalities Research Institute (LivHIR) and Liverpool PCT. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funder.

Funding

This work was supported by the Liverpool Health Inequalities Research Institute and Liverpool PCT.

Additional information

Funding

Funding: This work was supported by the Liverpool Health Inequalities Research Institute and Liverpool PCT.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 224.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.