Erratum

This article refers to:

Political consumerism and the participation gap: are boycotting and ‘buycotting’ youth-based activities?

Nonomura, R. 2016. “Political Consumerism and the Participation Gap: Are Boycotting and ‘Buycotting’ Youth-based Activities?” Journal of Youth Studies 20 (2): 234–251.

When the above article was first published online, some of the outputs for Models 1 and 2 were assigned to the incorrect Model. This has been corrected in the table below.

Table 3. Odds ratios from logistic regression models predicting political consumerism activity in the past 12 months, 2008 Statistics Canada GSS-22.

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Age (15–19)
20–24	1.909***	1.710**	0.788
25–29	2.169***	2.114***	0.876
30–34	2.338***	2.378***	0.955
35–39	2.040***	2.045***	0.861
40–44	1.912***	1.840***	0.806
45–49	2.071***	1.978***	0.920
50–54	2.065***	2.001***	0.940
55–59	1.836***	2.021***	0.944
60–64	1.645***	1.842***	0.832
65–69	1.397**	1.735***	0.814
70 and above	0.634***	0.782	0.401***
Female (Male)		1.132**	1.060
Married (Not Married)	0.790***	0.807***
Rural (Urban)		0.656***	0.770***
Religious Attendance (None)
Once or a few times annually	0.848**	0.830***
Monthly or weekly	0.865*	0.836**
Visible Minority (Non-visible minority)	0.440***	0.372***
Household Income ($20,000–39,999)
$0–19,999		0.828	0.913
$20,000–39,999	1.000	1.000
$40,000–59,999		1.074	0.953
$60,000–79,999		1.361***	1.088
$80,000–99,999		1.519***	1.124
$100,000+		2.002***	1.324***
Educational Attainment (Less than High School Diploma)
HS Diploma			1.946***
Some College			3.571***
Diploma/Certificate		3.351***
Doctorate, Masters, or Bachelor		6.317***
Pseudo R2	0.0203	0.0465	0.0843

Notes: Category in parenthesis is the reference group. ‘Political Consumer’ activities include purchasing or refusing to purchase a product for ethical reasons in the past 12 months.

*p ≤ .05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001.

Taylor & Francis apologises for this error.