Publication Cover
Culture, Health & Sexuality
An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care
Volume 21, 2019 - Issue 12
564
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Power relations and negotiations in contraceptive decision-making when husbands oppose family planning: analysis of ethnographic vignette couple data in Southwest Nigeria

, &
Pages 1439-1451 | Received 26 Jun 2018, Accepted 08 Jan 2019, Published online: 14 Feb 2019
 

Abstract

Contraceptive use in Nigeria has remained low at less than 15% for over two decades. Although husbands’ opposition is acknowledged as one of the factors impeding women’s contraceptive use, little is known about how wives negotiate when their husbands oppose family planning. We addressed this research gap by conducting thematic analyses of qualitative data from 30 interviews of married couples. We employed thematic analysis to identify relevant themes from the transcribed data. The findings clearly demonstrate attitudes highlighting an imbalance in power relations and contraceptive decision-making within marital relationships. By initially complying with the husband’s wish as a ‘sign of honour’, and then making further attempts at convincing him about family planning use, a woman can achieve her contraceptive target, or through the involvement of a third party. Wives are less empowered to overtly use contraceptives when their husbands oppose family planning. However, there are accepted justifications for covert use. The findings underscore the need to strengthen family planning interventions to enable behavioural change among Nigerian men, promote gender and reproductive health rights, and empower women with better negotiation skills.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Sarah Neal (University of Southampton) for her advice on the design of the vignette. We are also grateful to Christopher Oluwadare (Ekiti State University) for his contribution to the qualitative interviewing. Lastly, we thank Andrew Hinde (University of Southampton) and John Cleland (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) for their invaluable comments and suggestions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission, UK.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 263.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.