Publication Cover
Culture, Health & Sexuality
An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care
Volume 23, 2021 - Issue 8
639
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factors associated with frequency of gender identity nonaffirmation microaggressions among transgender persons

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1094-1110 | Received 19 Nov 2019, Accepted 09 Apr 2020, Published online: 21 May 2020
 

Abstract

Gender-based victimisation (GBV) is commonly experienced by transgender individuals, and can include physical or sexual violence; social, workplace, or housing discrimination; or family or social rejection. In addition to overt forms of GBV, transgender individuals experience gender identity-related microaggressions: subtle, frequently-occurring aversive events that convey nonaffirmation or rejection of an individual’s gender identity. The degree to which a transgender individual is socially perceived as the gender with which they identify, sometimes referred to as passing, as well as sociodemographic factors such as annual income and race/ethnicity, have been previously linked with experiencing overt GBV. This study aimed to quantitatively assess whether self-rated degree of passing, age, annual income and being a person of colour were associated with the frequency with which transgender individuals experience less overt identity-related victimisation in the form of gender nonaffirmation microaggressions. Among an age-diverse sample of US adolescent and adult transgender persons (n = 224) who responded to 14 situational prompts of nonaffirmation microaggressions, adolescents experienced the highest average weekly frequency of nonaffirmation microaggressions (M = 2.16, SD = 1.48). Factors significantly associated with increased average weekly frequency of nonaffirmation microaggressions included lower degree of passing and lower income, while older age was associated with lower frequency of microaggressions.

Disclosure statement

The second author is a research fellow for the Caitlyn Jenner Foundation, which provided initial funding for this research.

Notes

1 See Parr and Howe (Citation2019) for findings related to microaggression intensity and socioemotional response items.

2 Group differences in mean weekly frequency of nonaffirmation microaggressions were assessed using a Welch’s t-tests for independent samples. The logarithm of frequency was used to correct for nonnormality.

3 For χ2-tests of differences between groups, p-values were derived using a Monte Carlo procedure (500 replications) for exact estimation. As a result, degrees of freedom are not reported.

4 For passing model predictors, median r = .12 (range = -.06–.14), and for sociodemographic model predictors, median r = .01 (range = -.21–.48).

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Caitlyn Jenner Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 263.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.