The influence of social relationships on PrEP attitudes among women with incarceration experience in the Southeastern USA

Abstract

Women who have experienced incarceration face a disproportionately high risk of acquiring HIV. Despite efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV, very few women with incarceration histories are using PrEP. Our objective was to learn how sexual, drug-use and social relationships shape decisions about PrEP among women who have experienced incarceration. We used an inductive approach to analyse data from four focus groups undertaken with women who had previously experienced incarceration recruited from three community-based organisations. We identified public policy (medical distrust, lack of prevention in prisons and jails, and cost and coverage of PrEP); community (incarceration stigma, gossip as prevention); social and sexual network (positive peer and parenting relationships, distrust of sexual partners, and networks as a source of risk); and individual-level (active addiction or recovery, change after incarceration, and medical concerns) factors influencing the use of PrEP. Actions and interventions to improve PrEP uptake among women who have experienced incarceration must take account of the multilevel context of HIV prevention decisions.

Keywords:

• Women
• pre-exposure prophylaxis
• relationships

Acknowledgements

We thank the clients and staff of the community-based organisations that made this research possible.

Disclosure statement

AA has received consulting fees from Merck, Viiv, and Gilead, and UNC has received funds from Gilead for the research. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

De-identified qualitative data may be made available through a data use agreement with UNC. Please contact the corresponding author.

Additional information

Funding

The work described was supported by the US National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR002489) and the UNC WRHR Career Development Program (HD103085). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.