205
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Interviews with key risk researchers

Perspectives on the ‘lens of risk’ interview series: Interview with Nick Pidgeon

&
Pages 117-127 | Received 24 Jan 2012, Accepted 25 Jan 2012, Published online: 16 Mar 2012
 

Abstract

This article is the first in a series which will appear in 2012 in the special issue series Health Care Through the `Lens of Risk'. It provides a quasi-verbatim transcript of an interview with Nick Pidgeon, one of the main contributors to the social science component of The Royal Society Risk Report (1992). The interview contains a fascinating insider account of the debate about risk between engineers and social scientists who produced the report. It also offers some important reflections on the fissure which has opened up between risk sociology and research concerned with global and local system safety.

Notes

 1. Chemical industry accident near Milan in 1976 which caused regional dioxin exposure.

 2. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

 3. The ontology of risk remains ill-defined in the social sciences and more generally. One approach to thinking about the issue raised is to distinguish events such as nuclear accidents which ‘really’ kill from risks which reference prognostic limitations [Bob Heyman's comment].

 4. Many other, sometimes controversial examples can be given, for instance cheese avoidance if skeptics about the dietary fat intake-high ‘bad’ cholesterol-coronary heart disease linkage (Hann and Peckham 2010) are to be believed [Bob Heyman's comment].

 5. Failures arising from the same causal factors and therefore not statistically independent – c.f. the banking fiasco of 2007.

 6. ‘The probability that a particular adverse event occurs during a stated period of time, or results from a particular challenge.’

 7. The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF), currently in use for evaluating academic research, known at that time as the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE).

 8. The UK Economic and Social Research Council, the primary state funder of social science research.

 9. As argued above, merely imagining a selected contingency – what might happen – can invoke a `real' risk [Bob Heyman's comment].

10. A good example of culturally supported ‘risk iconography’ (Heyman et al. 2010, pp. 55–56) [Bob Heyman's comment].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 238.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.