3,274
Views
88
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles: Risk, parenting and public health

‘I know I'm a good mom’: Young, low-income mothers’ experiences with risk perception, intensive parenting ideology and parenting education programmes

&
Pages 273-289 | Received 14 Nov 2011, Accepted 25 Jan 2012, Published online: 26 Mar 2012
 

Abstract

Intensive mothering, which fits within neo-liberal notions of individual responsibility and risk management, and is based on middle-class ideals, is widely accepted as the ‘proper’ mode of child rearing. Intensive mothering ideology also intersects culturally with expanding notions of risks to children's wellbeing and increasing portrayals of parents as risk factors in their children's lives. State-driven interventions aimed at promoting intensive mothering practices and maximising child outcomes target young and low-income mothers as particular risk groups. This study explored the experiences of young, low-income mothers with intensive parenting advice and educational programmes that focused on child cognitive development. Intensive mothering expectations, and the mandated programmes that promoted them, were experienced as a prescriptive and regulative force in participants’ lives, and age and social class intersected to influence these experiences. Despite this, participants negotiated their own self-perceptions regarding motherhood by resisting, to some extent, the internalisation of intensive mothering ideals, and critiquing the validity of the advice. As a result, the guilt and self-discipline that often accompany intensive mothering for older middle-class mothers were largely absent for this group. Findings also suggest that the provision of basic needs is a potentially more effective policy direction for improving child and maternal well-being than the current neo-liberal focus on risk targeting, education and surveillance.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this research provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Notes

1.  All names have been changed to protect participant identity.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 238.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.