Abstract
In this article we examine how forensic mental health service users actively attempt to manage their risk status through playing the game of containing frustration and demonstrating compliance. The article draws on an observational study (2006 to 2009) which explored the practices of risk assessment and management within one inner city forensic mental health medium secure service in the UK. We used a grounded theory approach to explore service users’ and providers’ experiences of risk assessment and management. We interviewed forensic mental health service users and providers. We also collected data using participant and non-participant observation. Since access to forensic mental health services is tightly controlled, there are participant-observation studies undertaken in these settings.
We found that service users attempted to understand the system of assessment and sought to affect and reduce their risk status by engaging in overt, compliant behaviours. We argue that in doing so service users are active agents in the process of risk management. However, we indicate that there are adverse effects of this approach to risk management as the risk-assessment process is subverted by the restriction of the flow of information, and service users are left with frustrations that they must contain and manage.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Health Foundation who funded the research as part of a doctoral research fellowship. We also thank all the service users and providers who participated in the study.