522
Views
60
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring neuropsychological change following breast cancer treatment: An analysis of statistical models

, , , &
Pages 73-89 | Received 05 Oct 2007, Accepted 11 Feb 2008, Published online: 16 Dec 2008
 

Abstract

This article considers the quantitative techniques currently in use in the evaluation of cognitive impairments associated with chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer. To illustrate differences among analytical approaches, all analyses were applied to baseline and posttreatment scores on neuropsychological tests obtained from Stages I and II breast cancer patients receiving either chemotherapy or hormonal therapy; a healthy control group with similar demographics to those of the treatment groups was also included. Conventional group analyses were compared with individual-based analyses (standardized regression-based and reliable change methods). Both univariate and multivariate techniques with and without covariates produced negligible effects. In contrast, results of the individual-based analyses identified a subset of participants in the chemotherapy group who experienced a severe decline in function on two or more tests. Differences between the control and treatment groups were greater than differences between the treatment groups alone. The standardized regression-based approach was more sensitive than the reliable change index in detecting chemotherapy and hormonal therapy subjects whose performance was different from baseline scores on two or more tests (roughly 80% vs. 50% of participants). From a clinical perspective, the degree of impairment determined on the basis of the individual-based methodologies could have a major impact on quality of life for those affected. On the whole, we argue that the standardized regression-based approach, allowing for the assessment of individual practice effects and evaluation of moderator variables, is the method of choice in this context.

Acknowledgments

We would like to offer our sincere thanks to the women who generously contributed their time to participate in this study, to the reviewers who provided valuable feedback, and to the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation for their support.

Notes

1FEC = Fluorouracil (5FU), Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide; CEF = Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil; FAC = Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and 5-Fluorouracil.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 627.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.