786
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of objective and subjective clinical outcomes in combat veterans with and without mild TBI and PTSD: A four-group design

, , , , , & show all
Pages 665-679 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 15 Apr 2019, Published online: 14 May 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are highly prevalent comorbid conditions in military Veterans. However, lack of appropriate comparison groups has clouded interpretation of the chronic effects of these conditions. The present study evaluated the neuropsychological, psychiatric/neurobehavioral, and functional outcomes associated with mTBI and PTSD in a well-characterized sample of combat-exposed Veterans.

Method: Participants included 73 Iraq/Afghanistan Veterans (91.8% male; age: M = 34.00, SD = 6.39) divided into four groups: mTBI-only (n = 23), PTSD-only (n = 14), comorbid mTBI + PTSD (n = 19), and combat-control (CC; n = 17). Participants were administered a neuropsychological assessment and completed questionnaires assessing psychiatric/neurobehavioral symptoms and functional outcomes.

Results: Kruskal-Wallis H-tests showed no group differences across measures of neuropsychological functioning; however, there were significant differences across groups on all psychiatric/neurobehavioral variables examined. In general, the comorbid and PTSD-only groups endorsed the most severe symptoms, followed by the mTBI-only and CC groups, respectively. As for functional outcomes, the comorbid and PTSD-only groups had higher rates of service-connection disability and greater perceived decline in work and education-related abilities, relative to the mTBI-only and CC groups, despite similar proportions of Veterans employed or in school in each group.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that Veterans with comorbid mTBI + PTSD and PTSD alone are at greatest risk for experiencing long-lasting subjective distress, including negative perceptions of their ability to work or pursue an education, despite being comparable to mTBI-only and CC Veterans on objective measures of functioning. Our results highlight the importance of emphasizing mental health treatment in this population.

Acknowledgments

The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Veterans Affairs or Department of Defense position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by grant funding from: Department of Defense, Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) Award [W81XWH-13-2-0095] and Department of Veterans Affairs CENC Award [I01 CX001135]. Additionally, Laura Crocker received salary support during this work from a Career Development Award [IK2 RX002459] from the VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 627.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.