322
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Assessing and Treating Different Suicidal States in a Danish Outpatient Sample

, , , , , & show all
Pages 302-312 | Published online: 26 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

The studies presented compare two methodologies for categorizing suicidal patients based on clinical data. Discussion follows regarding implications for risk assessment and treatment. In these studies, 52 outpatient subjects were placed into different groups based on coding their “suicidal motivation” (Study 1) and their “internal struggle” ratings (Study 2) using data collected at intake. Self-report ratings of 6 Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Constructs (Psychological Pain, Stress, Agitation, Hopelessness, Self-Hate, and Overall Risk of Suicide) recorded both at intake and at completion of treatment were then compared to determine differences in Core Construct ratings among groups at different time points. In Study 1, overall differences among motivation groups (Life-motivated, Ambivalent, and Death-motivated) were significant for ratings at treatment completion of Overall Risk of Suicide, Self-Hate, and Psychological Pain. In Study 2, overall differences among groups (Wish to live, Ambivalent, and Wish to die) were significant for ratings at intake of Overall Risk of Suicide. At completion of treatment, overall differences among groups were significant for ratings of Overall Risk of Suicide, Hopelessness, and Self-Hate. In addition, significant interactions were found between test time and group for Overall Risk of Suicide and Self-Hate. Results suggest that categorizing suicidal patients by motivation and by the nature of their internal struggle could be beneficial to differential risk assessment with implications for clinical treatment.

Notes

Note. Groups presented in this table were derived by subtracting the total number of Reasons For Dying responses from the total number of Reasons For Living responses for each subject.

a Significant difference from one other group within the same Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Construct.

*Overall model significant at p < .05.

Note. Groups presented in this table were derived by calculating a Suicide Index Score (subtracting the converted Wish to Die score from the converted Wish to Live score) for each subject.

a Significant difference from one other group within the same Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Construct.

*Overall model significant at p < .05.

**Overall model significant at p < .001.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 344.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.