5,211
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The importance of gender in health problems

, &
Pages 33-37 | Published online: 11 Jul 2009

Abstract

Objective: To investigate gender differences in health problems in general practice. Methods: We performed a study using data from the Continuous Morbidity Registration (CMR) Nijmegen. To study the distribution by gender we analysed overall morbidity per 1000 patients years over a period of 10 years. Secondly we calculated the influence of gender by diagnostic rubric. For each diagnosis in the rubric of musculoskeletal disorders, we calculated incidence and sex ratio related to socio econonomic status (SES). We did the same concerning the referral rates for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Results: Women had significantly more health problems than men, most striking in the age group 25–44 years, due to screening and reproductive health problems. Concerning gender differences related to SES in muskulo skeletal disorders we found the lower the SES the more prevalent is osteoarthritis of the knee in women. The sex ratios in CVD showed men as leading sufferers. Decreasing SES resulted in increasing incidence of CVD and a lower referral rate to the cardiologist in women.

Conclusion: Sex differences appear in the prevalence of health problems, risk factors and access to medical care. They also can influence the course of diseases. Health problems in men and women also vary according to socio-economic status, meaning that gender is strongly intertwined as risk factor with socio-economic status, ethnicity, and age.

Introduction

Gender is an essential determinant of social outcomes, including health. Moreover, gender cannot be separated from other social identifiers such as ethnicity, age, or socio-economic status. Although the impact of ethnic diversity or socio-economic status on health can hardly be underestimated, gender does play a pivotal role within these social identifiers.

Differences in health between men and women are due to the interactions of biological, psychological, and social factors Citation[1]. Attention to gender differences is relevant not only in reproductive functioning, but also in other health fields, such as the prevalence of diseases, risk factors, presentation of health complaints, impact of illness, and the treatment and course of diseases Citation[2]. The World Health Organization's “Gender Policy” recommended that an integration of gender considerations become standard as a contribution to better health for women and men Citation[3].

Extensive research on sex differences has shown that women have higher rates of morbidity and utilize medical care more often than men Citation[2], Citation[4]. Although research has revealed strong evidence for the presence of sex differences in morbidity and medical care utilization in general, the relation between gender and specific types of morbidity and health problems is only being gradually clarified.

Sex differences in morbidity may be based on self-reported perceptions of symptoms, or on physicians’ evaluations of health status through clinical diagnosis. In the present study, we analysed medical diagnoses and health problems registered by general practitioners working in the practices of the Continuous Morbidity Registration (CMR) Nijmegen project.

The aim of the study is to investigate gender differences in health problems in general practice. We wish to analyse some specific health problems as examples to give more insight into the role gender might play in health problems in general. We therefore focus firstly on gender differences in the prevalence of overall health problems in relation to age, followed by gender differences related to socio-economic status in musculoskeletal disorders and, more specifically, on osteoarthritis of the knee. Secondly, we study gender and socio-economic status in cardiovascular diseases and referrals to secondary specialist care. Finally, we conclude with an example of gender differences in the course of one health problem, namely inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Methods

The data used were obtained from the CMR Citation[5]. Firstly, we compared overall male and female health problems, by age and by severity, as presented in primary care. Overall morbidity for patients in this study comprises the total number of registered ICHPPC-2 health problems per 1000 patient years over a period of 10 years. Secondly, we calculated the influence of gender per diagnostic rubric, by dividing the sex difference in incidence per diagnostic rubric by the sex difference in overall diagnostic rubrics, multiplied by 100. Incidence is defined as the number of new cases per 1000 patient years, in which one patient year is defined as one patient who has been followed for 1 year. Prevalence reflects the sum of the number of newly presented health problems and ongoing health problems per 1000 patient years. For each age group, incidence and prevalence of health problems were computed.

We used four categories for severity: serious, i.e., the disease threatens the patient's life or has a long-term impact on the patient's functional capacities; moderately serious, i.e., the disease temporarily interferes with the patient's functional capacities; not serious, i.e., the disease does not influence the patient's functional capacity. A fourth category was used to indicate not otherwise classified.

For each diagnosis in the rubric of musculoskeletal disorders, we calculated incidence and sex ratio. Sex ratios represent the incidence of women divided by the incidence of men. We did the same concerning the referral rates for angina pectoris and myocardial infarction.

Morbidity per 1000 patient years is calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for men and women separately. We calculated relative risks, and we defined this as the chance of women having a diagnosis as compared with men. Two-tailed Student's t tests were carried out to test differences in male and female rates.

For comparison between men and women in complications in the course of IBD, we used Cox proportional hazard analysis.

In our study, we defined results with a p value < 0.05 as significant.

Results

Overall morbidity

Women had significantly more health problems than men (2286 and 1589 per 1000 patients, respectively; p<0.001). For each age group, we computed the prevalence of health problems for men and women. The sex difference in the prevalence of health problems was the most striking in the age group 25 to 44 years of age (p<0.001) (). Screening and health education (contraception, health advice and prevention, screening and diagnostic procedures) accounted for the major part of the sex differences, followed by genitourinary system diseases and diseases of the respiratory system (). In all four severity categories, the incidence of presented health problems was higher for women than for men; however, per category, the percentage of overall diagnostic rubrics was smaller for women than for men in all four severity categories, except for the category “not otherwise specified” ().

Figure 1.  Overall health problems: incidence per 1000 men and 1000 women per year, by age.

Figure 1.  Overall health problems: incidence per 1000 men and 1000 women per year, by age.

Figure 2.  Contribution (%) to sex difference in overall morbidity per diagnostic rubric.

Figure 2.  Contribution (%) to sex difference in overall morbidity per diagnostic rubric.

Table I.  Comparative incidence of health problems and their distribution (%) for men and women, by severity.

Musculoskeletal disorders

An evident outnumbering of women was clearly seen in all diagnoses of musculoskeletal orders, except for herniated disc (). Osteoarthritis of the knee is twice as prevalent in women compared with men, especially among the elderly (at age ≥75, the prevalence is 129.3 [95% CI 115.3–143.3] for men versus 279.7 [95% CI 264.1–295.3] for women). The lower the socio-economic status, the more prevalent is osteoarthritis of the knee in women. In the low and middle socio-economic classes, women present more osteoarthritis of the knee than men: the prevalence in patients of low socio-economic status is 23.7 (95% CI 21.8–25.7) in men versus 48.1 (95% CI 45.2–50.9) in women; the prevalence in patients of middle socio-economic status is 15.5 (95% CI 14.0–17.0) in men and 35.9 (CI 33.7–38.1) in women.

Figure 3.  Male/female ratio of musculoskeletal disorders.

Figure 3.  Male/female ratio of musculoskeletal disorders.

Cardiovascular diseases

The sex ratios in the incidence of myocardial infarction and angina pectoris showed a reverse outcome, with men as leading sufferers: 3.4 and 3.0 for men and 2.1 and 2.1 for women, respectively (p<0.01) Citation[6]. However, the same phenomenon occurred when comparing the incidence in men and women by socio-economic status: decreasing socio-economic status resulted in an increasing incidence of cardiovascular diseases, in particular in women. Women with angina pectoris with low socio-economic status have a relative risk of 2.24 (95% CI 1.17–3.26) compared with women with high socio-economic status. In men, no significant difference was found between the socio-economic status groups.

Analysing the referral rate of angina pectoris to the cardiologist showed that, in the low socio-economic status group, 53.3% of the men were referred compared to 21.3% of the women (p=0.03).

Course of inflammatory bowel disease

The study population comprised 48 patients in the period 1985–2001: 22 women and 26 men Citation[7]. Mean age was 39.3 (SD 20.6) years in women and 39.7 (SD 16.9) years in men. Most patients suffered from one or more relapses in IBD. In men, relapse in IBD occurred almost 10 years after the time of diagnosis (first presentation) and in women after 6 years and 10 months (). Also, the interval between the diagnosis of IBD and a symptom-free condition without drugs differed between men and women. Almost three-quarters of the male patients did not use any drugs after 151 months, while in women it was 58% after 204 months ().

Figure 4.  Time between diagnosis and first relapse in IBD.

Figure 4.  Time between diagnosis and first relapse in IBD.

Figure 5.  Time between diagnosis and start of medication in IBD.

Figure 5.  Time between diagnosis and start of medication in IBD.

Discussion

We found that presentation to the general practitioner of more health problems by women was partly accounted for by disorders of the genitourinary system, but above all by screening and health education. This finding contradicts the assertions that nervous or vague complaints account for the greater number of female health complaints.

In accordance with the literature, we also found that health problems such as osteoarthritis of the knee and coronary heart disease varied according to socio-economic status. The lower the socio-economic status, the higher was the morbidity Citation[8]. Surprisingly, in women with low socio-economic status, the relative risk of suffering from knee osteoarthritis or coronary heart disease is higher than for men with low socio-economic status. This outcome stresses the importance of paying attention to the concept of diversity, including socio-economic status, ethnicity, age, and gender as interrelated risk factors. Differences should not be considered as separate entities, since it seems clear that they do not operate independently but are strongly intertwined.

Another striking finding was that women with angina pectoris and low socio-economic status were referred to cardiologists significantly less often than men. Women present more often with atypical angina pectoris, and a recent study confirmed that women have less access to invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures Citation[9]. Our figures revealed that low socio-economic status could strengthen the effect of undertreatment of women.

Finally, sex differences not only appear in the prevalence of health problems, risk factors, and access to secondary medical care, but also in the course of diseases. We studied inflammatory bowel diseases as just one example to illustrate that gender can make a difference in terms of a whole range of medical encounters, from first presentation to course and treatment Citation[7], Citation[10]. A steadily increasing body of evidence has revealed disparities in symptoms and prognosis in many other health problems, such as HIV/AIDS, other sexually transmitted diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmune disorders Citation[1]. During the course of life, genetic information in the sex chromosome can be expressed differently between men and women, owing to a wide range of environmental factors. These genetic differences between the sexes also lead to differences in sensitivity and susceptibility to diseases between the sexes. Differences between the sexes can also be expressed non-uniformly in other biological phases of life, while certain factors, such as hormonal differences, can contribute to deviations in the development and course of diseases between men and women Citation[11].

References

  • Lagro-Janssen ALM. Sex, gender and health. Developments in research. European Journal of Women's Studies 2007; 14: 9–20
  • Stoverinck MJM, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Weel C van. Sex differences in health problems. Diagnostic testing and referral in primary care. J Fam Pract 1996;43:567–76.
  • World Health Organization. WHO gender policy: integrating gender perspectives in the work of WHO. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002.
  • Gijsbers van Wijk CMT, Kolk AMM, Bosch WJHM van den, Hoogen H van den. Male and female morbidity in general practice: the nature of sex differences. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:665–78.
  • Weel C van. The continuous morbidity registration Nijmegen. Background and history of a Dutch general practice database. ( this issue).
  • Vogels EA, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Weel C van. Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:963–6.
  • Kemenade O van, Roek M, Lagro-Janssen T. Chronische inflammatoire darmziekten in vier huisartspraktijken. [Inflammatory bowel diseases in four general practices.] Huisarts Wet 2004;47:615–9.
  • Chandola L. Social inequality in coronary heart disease: a comparison of occupational classifications. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 525–33
  • Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation 2006; 113: 490–8
  • Prickarts M, Lagro-Janssen T. Polymyalgia rheumatica in vier huisartspraktijken. [Polymyalgia rheumatica in four general practices]. Huisarts Wet 1999; 42: 597–601
  • Wizemann TM, Pardue ML. Exploring the biological contribution to human health: does sex matter?. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.