Publication Cover
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development
Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 3
175
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Age, criterion flexibility, and item recognition

, , , &
Pages 390-405 | Received 21 Oct 2016, Accepted 07 Apr 2017, Published online: 26 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

We examined young and older adults' ability to flexibly adapt response criterion on a recognition test when the probability that a test item had been studied was cued by test color. One word color signaled that the probability of the test item being old was 70% and a second color signaled that the probability of the test item being new was 70%. Young and older adults demonstrated similar levels of criterion shifting in response to color cues. Moreover, although both young and older adults were slowed when test-item color incorrectly predicted test-item status, the extent of slowing did not differ across age group. Putative measures of cognitive control predicted recognition accuracy but not the degree to which criterion changed with test-item color. These results suggest that adaptive criterion shifting does not tax cognitive control or, if it does require effort, may be no more onerous for older than for young adults.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Pitzer College Research and Awards Committee. The authors thank Edgar Erdfelder for sharing his statistical acumen and Ian Dobbins and two anonymous reviewers for their trenchant comments on an earlier version of this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. At each query point, including a later one noted below, all participants responded accurately to these questions, indicating that they had knowledge about the contingency between word color and test status.

2. When controlling for age group, the partial correlations for the difference in C values were virtually identical to the bivariate correlations with values of .087 (digits total), .067 (proportional increase in response time on the Trail Making Test), and .048 for NAART errors. The partial correlations for mean d were .234 (digits total), −.298 (proportional increase in response times on the Trail Making Test), and −.287 (NAART errors, now significant at p = .014, one-tailed test).

3. We should note that while our study addresses potential age differences in criterion flexibility, it does not address the issue of whether providing external cues to test item status improves recognition accuracy (Konkel et al., Citation2015) because we did not include no-cue or 50% valid cue conditions.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Pitzer College Research and Awards Committee.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 528.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.