Publication Cover
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development
Volume 29, 2022 - Issue 4
254
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Age-differences in interpreting the valence of ambiguous facial expressions: evidence for multiple contributing processes

, &
Pages 720-732 | Received 26 May 2020, Accepted 03 Mar 2021, Published online: 29 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Surprised facial expressions, which are ambiguous in valence, are interpreted more positively by older adults than by younger adults. To evaluate the processes contributing to this age difference, we varied the spatial frequency of the surprised-face stimuli. When faces were presented in a low-spatial-frequency band, it biased participants to rate them negatively. Although this occurred for both younger and older adults, the older adults’ ratings of the low-spatial-frequency faces were more positive than that of the younger adults. This suggests that there is an age-related reduction in the default negativity of interpretations. We also found that older adults, as a whole, rated the high-spatial-frequency faces more positively than did younger adults. However, this effect was eliminated for the subset of older adults with poor high-spatial-frequency perception abilities for whom these faces were difficult to perceive. Thus, older adults’ more positive interpretations of surprised faces may also reflect cognitively-effortful regulatory processes.

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Kriti Cadambi, Megan Chesher, Dimitrius Ellisen, Briana Kennedy, Ringo Huang, Melissa Ortiz, Jordan Seliger, and Rico Velasco for assistance with data collection and coding.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Notes

1. Within block 2, two of the HSF surprised faces and two of the LSF surprised faces were previously seen in broadband format during block 1. Excluding these trials does not affect any of the reported results.

2. Three older adult participants were unable to use the chin rest due to physical disabilities or discomfort. Excluding these participants does not change any of the reported patterns of results.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 528.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.