Acknowledgments
The data in this work was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number 5P20 GM109025.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. A second function was also significant with a canonical correlation of r = .358, 12.8% variance explained, F(16, 250) = 2.643, p = .014, Wilks’ Λ = .872. This function represents variance that is independent of that accounted for in the first function; because this was unexpected, explains little variance, and it is not clear what constructs it represents, we refrain from interpreting it.