373
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FORENSIC APPLICATIONS

Noncredible Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptoms in a Workers' Compensation “Stress” Claim Sample

, , &
Pages 754-765 | Accepted 12 Oct 2005, Published online: 13 Aug 2008
 

Abstract

Information is lacking regarding the prevalence of fraudulent psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in the “stress” claim workers' compensation population. Using various validity indices (Negative Impression Scale, the Malingering Index, and the Rogers Discriminant Function) of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), between 9 and 29% of 233 workers' compensation “stress” claim litigants were identified as exhibiting noncredible psychiatric symptoms. In addition, 15% of the subjects were determined to have noncredible cognitive symptoms on the Dot Counting Test, although only 8% displayed suspect effort on the 15-Item Memorization Test, with 5% of subjects failing both cognitive effort tests. The percentage of positive identifications on both a PAI and cognitive credibility index ranged from only 2 to 4%. Further, correlations between PAI validity indices and cognitive effort scales were nonexistent to modest, indicating that the psychiatric and cognitive credibility indices are measuring different aspects of noncredible symptom production. It was predicted that the PAI profiles of the participants displaying suspect cognitive symptoms would be elevated on the Somatic Concerns, Antisocial, and/or Borderline scales; however, elevations (relative to subjects with credible cognitive performance) were instead noted on the Somatic Concerns, Depression, Anxiety, Anxiety-Related Disorders, and Schizophrenia scales.

Notes

Note. N = 233; NIM = Negative Impression Scale; MAL = Malingering Index; RDF = Rogers Discriminant Function; DOT = Dot Counting Combination Score (mean ungrouped dot counting time + mean ungrouped dot counting time + number of errors); REY-15 = total score on 15-Item Memorization Test.

***p < .001.

Note. N = 233; NIM = Negative Impression Scale; MAL = Malingering Index; RDF = Rogers Discriminant Function; REY-15 = Total Score on 15-Item Memorization Test; DOT = Dot Counting Combination score (mean ungrouped dot counting time + mean grouped dot counting time + number of errors).

Note. N = 233; REY-15 = Total Score on 15-Item Memorization Test; DOT = Dot Counting Combination score (mean ungrouped dot counting time + mean grouped dot counting time + number of errors).

a PAI Clinical Scales—scores are reported as T scores.

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p* < .001.

Note. N = 233; REY-15 = Total Score on 15-Item Memorization Test; DOT COUNT = Dot Counting Combination score (mean ungrouped dot counting time + mean grouped dot counting time + number of errors).

a PAI Clinical Scales—scores are reported as T scores.

*p < .05; **p < .05.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.