726
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

Alexithymia and Executive Function in Younger and Older Adults

&
Pages 938-955 | Received 18 Jun 2015, Accepted 17 Nov 2015, Published online: 24 Dec 2015
 

Abstract

Objective: Alexithymia is associated with adverse mental and physical health outcomes. Determining neuropsychological factors associated with alexithymia may aid in elucidating its underlying mechanisms and identifying treatment targets. Accumulating evidence indicates that executive dysfunction may co-occur with alexithymia in younger adults (YA). However, research on this link in older adults (OA), who may be at greater risk for alexithymia, is scant. This study determined associations between alexithymia and executive function (EF) in healthy younger and OA. Alexithymia was predicted to be associated with poorer EF in both age-groups. Method: Younger (n = 65, aged 18–30; 46% female) and OA (n = 44, aged 61–92; 73% female) completed the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, three EF tasks (Verbal Fluency, Design Fluency, and Trail Making), measures of memory and verbal IQ, and a self-report measure of depressive symptoms. Three EF composites were created to assess verbal EF, visuospatial EF, and global EF. Results: Greater alexithymia and difficulty describing feelings were associated with poorer verbal EF in OA (p = .02 and p = .005, respectively) but not in YA (ps > .05). The other neuropsychological measures were not significantly associated with alexithymia in regression analyses. Conclusions: Findings are consistent with previous research identifying links between EF and alexithymia. The association between alexithymia and verbal EF may be due to shared prefrontal circuitry involved in emotion regulation. Results provide insight into possible origins of emotion self-awareness deficits in OA.

Notes

1 Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance was significant (p < .05) for the following variables in OA vs. YA comparisons: education, CES-D, verbal EF composite, and visual memory composite. This violation of homogeneity of variance was corrected by not using the pooled estimate for the error term of the t-statistic and by adjusting the degrees of freedom using the Welch–Satterthwaite method for these variables.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.